|
<<previous |
next>> |
|
|
The World Order of Bahá'u'lláh
|
Pages 42-45
|
|
The Principle of Oneness
| |
1 |
Let there be no mistake. The principle of the Oneness of Mankind--
the pivot round which all the teachings of Bahá'u'lláh revolve
--is no mere outburst of ignorant emotionalism or an expression of
vague and pious hope. Its appeal is not to be merely identified with
a reawakening of the spirit of brotherhood and good-will among
men, nor does it aim solely at the fostering of harmonious cöoperation
among individual peoples and nations. Its implications are
deeper, its claims greater than any which the Prophets of old were
allowed to advance. Its message is applicable not only to the individual,
but concerns itself primarily with the nature of those essential
relationships that must bind all the states and nations as members
of one human family. It does not constitute merely the enunciation
of an ideal, but stands inseparably associated with an institution
adequate to embody its truth, demonstrate its validity, and perpetuate
its influence. It implies an organic change in the structure of present-day
society, a change such as the world has not yet experienced. It
constitutes a challenge, at once bold and universal, to outworn
shibboleths of national creeds--creeds that have had their day and
which must, in the ordinary course of events as shaped and controlled
by Providence, give way to a new gospel, fundamentally different
from, and infinitely superior to, what the world has already conceived.
It calls for no less than the reconstruction and the demilitarization
of the whole civilized world--a world organically unified
in all the essential aspects of its life, its political machinery, its
spiritual aspiration, its trade and finance, its script and language,
and yet infinite in the diversity of the national characteristics of its
federated units.
| |
2 |
It represents the consummation of human evolution--an evolution
that has had its earliest beginnings in the birth of family life, its
subsequent development in the achievement of tribal solidarity, leading
in turn to the constitution of the city-state, and expanding later
into the institution of independent and sovereign nations.
| |
3 |
The principle of the Oneness of Mankind, as proclaimed by
Bahá'u'lláh, carries with it no more and no less than a solemn
assertion that attainment to this final stage in this stupendous evolution
is not only necessary but inevitable, that its realization is fast
approaching, and that nothing short of a power that is born of God
can succeed in establishing it.
| |
4 |
So marvellous a conception finds its earliest manifestations in the
efforts consciously exerted and the modest beginnings already
achieved by the declared adherents of the Faith of Bahá'u'lláh who,
conscious of the sublimity of their calling and initiated into the
ennobling principles of His Administration, are forging ahead to
establish His Kingdom on this earth. It has its indirect manifestations
in the gradual diffusion of the spirit of world solidarity which
is spontaneously arising out of the welter of a disorganized society.
| |
5 |
It would be stimulating to follow the history of the growth
and development of this lofty conception which must increasingly
engage the attention of the responsible custodians of the destinies of
peoples and nations. To the states and principalities just emerging
from the welter of the great Napoleonic upheaval, whose chief preoccupation
was either to recover their rights to an independent
existence or to achieve their national unity, the conception of world
solidarity seemed not only remote but inconceivable. It was not until
the forces of nationalism had succeeded in overthrowing the foundations
of the Holy Alliance that had sought to curb their rising power,
that the possibility of a world order, transcending in its range the
political institutions these nations had established, came to be seriously
entertained. It was not until after the World War that these
exponents of arrogant nationalism came to regard such an order as
the object of a pernicious doctrine tending to sap that essential
loyalty upon which the continued existence of their national life
depended. With a vigor that recalled the energy with which the members
of the Holy Alliance sought to stifle the spirit of a rising
nationalism among the peoples liberated from the Napoleonic yoke,
these champions of an unfettered national sovereignty, in their turn,
have labored and are still laboring to discredit principles upon which
their own salvation must ultimately depend.
| |
6 |
The fierce opposition which greeted the abortive scheme of the
Geneva Protocol; the ridicule poured upon the proposal for a United
States of Europe which was subsequently advanced, and the failure
of the general scheme for the economic union of Europe, may appear
as setbacks to the efforts which a handful of foresighted people are
earnestly exerting to advance this noble ideal. And yet, are we not
justified in deriving fresh encouragement when we observe that the
very consideration of such proposals is in itself an evidence of their
steady growth in the minds and hearts of men? In the organized
attempts that are being made to discredit so exalted a conception are
we not witnessing the repetition, on a larger scale, of those stirring
struggles and fierce controversies that preceded the birth, and assisted
in the reconstruction, of the unified nations of the West?
| |
|
|
|