[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distraction?
Oh, my goodness! This sounds similar to the theme of a play I saw this
weekend at The Mount performed by Shakespear @ Company. The play is Jack
and Jill by Jane Martin, about whom little is known except that the author
is a man! (Anyone on the list know anything about the author?)
The play takes place over a period of about 15 years and Jack is positive
and nice while Jill is questioning everything about their relationship,
feeling that he does not tell her how he really feels. When he does to
wards the end of the second act, it is explosive! Second act much better
than the first.
Ronnie C.
-----Original Message-----
From: James G. Cassedy [SMTP:james.cassedy@ARCH2.NARA.GOV]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 4:24 PM
To: ARCHIVES@LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
Subject: Distraction?
Psychologists Frown on the Smiley Face
By Erica Goode New York Times Service (August 15, 2000)
NEW YORK - Barbara Held has had just about enough of
accentuating
the positive and eliminating the negative.
She does not want to cheer up, look on the bright side
or let a smile be her
umbrella. And she is not planning to put a smiley face
sticker on her car
bumper.
In fact, she views such activities as rather worrisome.
She is one of a small
band of psychologists who believe that their profession
- and indeed the
United States as a whole - has succumbed to an ethos of
unrelenting
positivity. This ''tyranny of the positive attitude,''
as Ms. Held sees it,
prescribes cheerfulness and optimism as a formula for
success, resilience
and good health, and equates negativity with failure,
vulnerability and
general unhealthiness.
Positive thinking is a staple of self-help books,
popular music and Sunday
sermons. And in recent years, it has also found a home
in the positive
psychology movement, which was founded to correct what
its leaders,
including Martin Seligman, a professor of psychology at
the University of
Pennsylvania and a former president of the American
Psychological
Association, saw as the field's overly narrow focus on
mental illness and
human failing.
But Ms. Held and like-minded colleagues, who gathered
last week at the
psychological association's meetings in Washington for
a symposium titled
''The (Overlooked) Virtues of Negativity,'' feel that
bliss can be taken too
far.
While positive thinking has its advantages, they argue,
a little whining now
and then is not such a bad thing. Pessimism, in some
circumstances, may
have its place. And the pressure to be upbeat, they
assert, may gloss over
individual needs and differences, and may make one feel
worse instead of
better.
''I'm worried that we're not making space for people to
feel bad,'' said Ms.
Held, a clinical psychologist at Bowdoin College in
Brunswick, Maine, and
the author of ''Stop Smiling Start Kvetching.''
''Life is very hard,'' Ms. Held said. ''If you're
having a hard time with
something, it can make it harder to cope if you feel
pressure to act O.K.
when you're not.''
A large body of experimental work has elaborated on the
pluses of
optimism and positive thinking, which appear to have
beneficial effects on
performance, social adjustment and some aspects of
health. But at least
some research supports the notion that in some cases,
it may be more useful
to see the glass as half empty.
Julie Norem, a social psychologist at Wellesley
College, for example, has
studied ''defensive pessimism,'' a coping strategy that
involves setting
unrealistically low expectations, then mentally playing
out all the possible
outcomes of a given situation.
For instance, Ms. Norem explained, a defensive
pessimist is likely to
approach a coming public speaking engagement with
mounting anxiety. But
rather than giving herself a pep talk or using positive
imagery to calm herself
down, the defensive pessimist will picture herself
tripping over the
microphone cord, dropping her notes and dissolving into
a fit of coughing.
Yet this anxious reverie will also include plans for
avoiding such humiliation,
like wearing low heeled-shoes or having a glass of
water on the lectern.
''This mental rehearsal tends to make defensive
pessimists feel less anxious,
and so they actually perform better,'' Ms. Norem said.
Researchers have investigated the benefits of griping
(high for those who do
it infrequently, lower for frequent complainers) and
the extent of pessimism
in different cultures. Asian-Americans, one study
found, are more
pessimistic than Caucasian-Americans, and are more
likely to use
pessimism as a way of coping.
Work by James Pennebaker, a professor of psychology at
the University of
Texas at Austin, also underlines the positive role of
what some might call
''constructive negativity.''
Obsessively ruminating about how miserable life is,
studies show, can have
a harmful effect on health. But in a series of studies,
Mr. Pennebaker and
his colleagues asked subjects to focus on stressful or
disturbing life events in
a structured way, writing essays about the most
traumatic experience of
their lives, for example. The subjects' health improved
on a variety of
measures, and this improvement persisted for up to four
months after the
studies were over.
Mr. Pennebaker said that he was happy to be considered
part of the
positive psychology movement. But, he added, ''A lot
depends on what we
mean by positive psychology.''
''There's some reasonably compelling evidence to
suggest that when people
are falsely peppy and upbeat and chipper, it's not very
healthy,'' he said.
And, he added, little data supports the idea that a
positive attitude enhances
health - something he pointed out repeatedly several
years ago when his
wife developed breast cancer, and people kept telling
her, ''You just need
to be positive all the time.''
In fact, Mr. Pennebaker said, a 1989 study he published
with David
Watson, now at the University of Iowa, indicates that
even nervous,
unhappy people, prone to chronic complaining, appear to
be no more
unhealthy than their buoyant peers. Subjects in the
study who scored high
on measures of nervousness, apprehension, irritability
and oversensitivity
were more likely to complain about physical symptoms.
But they were no
more likely to visit the doctor, develop high blood
pressure or die.
''It's not bad to be nervous and it's not bad to be
angry,'' Mr. Watson said
in an interview. ''We have these emotions because they
serve useful
functions for us.''
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List!
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to listserv@listserv.muohio.edu
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to archives@listserv.muohio.edu
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <rschmidt@lib.muohio.edu>
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List!
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to listserv@listserv.muohio.edu
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to archives@listserv.muohio.edu
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <rschmidt@lib.muohio.edu>