PRWTOTOKOS with EK in Col 1.18

Ronald Wong (dogtoy@isgroup.net)
Tue, 25 Feb 1997 00:59:28 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David McKay: "The three fates"
Previous message: Juan Stam B: "PRWTOTOKOS with EK in Col 1.18"

Juan....I'm an amateur when it comes to the greek...but I don't think
that there is an NT occurance of EK in the genitive case...I believe
it's only used in the Ablative Case.. I don't know if this would make
any difference in your nuanced of meaning or not. This would indicate
your partitive nature...by the very nature of the Ablative case but I
cannot say what the lack of the EK would mean in v.15.

Could the Gen. in v. 15 be a Genitive of Relationship? (cf Dana &
Mantey 76)

Ronald Wong
O'Brien, FL.

Next message: David McKay: "The three fates"
Previous message: Juan Stam B: "PRWTOTOKOS with EK in Col 1.18"