[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tim's.post

Apparently, I owe an apology to Bill.  I must have missed something in the
post from which I quoted.
  
>tim's post did not seem to me to correspond to the point i was  making.
>someone on anglican said that, if you could render it back into the original,
>it would be a translation, but, if not, it would be a paraphrase. i had been
>questioning that very assertion with my question and making the same point tim
>thought he was making to me.
>
>in the light of the dynamic equivalence rage, however, the question remains
>whether the distinction between translation and paraphrase could be made with
>sufficient clarity.
>
>shalom,
>bearded bill of asheville <bthurman@unca.edu>
>unca not having approved either whom or thereof.
>p.s. material like the TEV that professes to follow d. e. often yields results
>neithr dynamic nor equivalent.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim McLay           tmclay@atcon.com

Surface: 2415 Prospect Rd.
         Hatchet Lake, NS
         B3T 1V2   Canada