[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Passive Infinitive in John 3:30
- To: Jim Beale <beale@uconect.net>
- Subject: Re: Passive Infinitive in John 3:30
- From: "Carl W. Conrad" <cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 07:10:30 -0400
- Cc: b-greek@virginia.edu
- In-Reply-To: <l03010d06afae56c79103@[204.60.153.19]>
At 5:15 PM -0400 5/25/97, Jim Beale wrote:
>Greetings all;
>
>I was reading through John's Gospel, and I stopped to wonder at
>John 3:30,
>
> EKEINON DEI AUCANEIN, EME DE ELATTOUSQAI.
>
>Since EME is in the accusative, and ELATTOUSQAI is passive, I
>wondered why this verse is invariably translated as if the
>nominative and the active voice were present? Why not rather
>translate it as passive, "It is necessary for Him to increase,
>but for me to be decreased"?
The reason is that ELATTOUSQAI is middle (or reflexive), NOT passive--and
the English equivalents most commonly used to translate both of the Greek
verbs here in the infinitive are generally intransitive: "He must wax, but
I must wane."
This verse always reminds me of the very idiomatic Thucydidean dictum, a
sort of expression of the second law of thermodynamics: PANTA FILEI
ELATTOUSQAI, "Everything tends to degenerate."
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, USA 63130
(314) 935-4018
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cwc@oui.com
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
Follow-Ups:
References: