Search found 3 matches

by Aubrey Sequeira
September 7th, 2014, 10:36 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Hebrews 10:37 Future Indicative vs. Subjunctive
Replies: 2
Views: 944

Hebrews 10:37 Future Indicative vs. Subjunctive

In the citation of Habakkuk 2:3–4 in Hebrews 10:37–38, Hebrews has a negated future indicative as opposed to the LXX's emphatic-negative subjunctive. Heb 10:37 - ὁ ἐρχόμενος ἥξει καὶ οὐ χρονίσει· Hab 2:3b LXX - ἐρχόμενος ἥξει καὶ οὐ μὴ χρονίσῃ. The author of Hebrews has edited Hab 2:3–4 and made oth...
by Aubrey Sequeira
October 15th, 2013, 11:48 am
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: Question on Present Tense in Romans 7.14-25
Replies: 5
Views: 4716

Re: Question on Present Tense in Romans 7.14-25

Thanks! Yes, I would rather focus on the way the present tense is functioning in the text instead of the theological debate! I apologize for framing the discussion along those lines. The Runge article is available online: http://www.ntdiscourse.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Runge-ReconsideringHP.pd...
by Aubrey Sequeira
October 15th, 2013, 10:11 am
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: Question on Present Tense in Romans 7.14-25
Replies: 5
Views: 4716

Question on Present Tense in Romans 7.14-25

Moderator's note: please ignore the theological debate outlined in this message and focus on the text itself, and what it means. One of the arguments used by proponents of a "Christian view" of Romans 7:14-25 is Paul's shift to the present tense in these verses (cf. Dunn, Cranfield). On t...

Go to advanced search