Search found 842 matches
- January 15th, 2024, 10:13 am
- Forum: What does this text mean?
- Topic: Origen Fragment
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1070
Re: Origen Fragment
Hello, I have a question about the exact translation of a passage of one of Origen’s fragments on the gospel of Matthew. The passage is a little difficult, so even though I have a good idea of what he’s saying, I just want to make sure my translation is correct. Here is the passage: Δεῖ τοίνυν μὴ μ...
- January 3rd, 2024, 12:18 pm
- Forum: Announcements, Questions, and Policies
- Topic: GenR
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1773
Re: GenR
Yes, the abbreviation list in Volume 2, Page xlix indicates GenR stands for Bere’šit Rabbah. You can access it at https://www.sefaria.org/Bereshit_Rabbah?tab=contentsJason Hare wrote: ↑December 29th, 2023, 3:57 pm (2) GenR most certainly refers to Genesis Rabba, a set of midrash on the book of Genesis.
- January 2nd, 2024, 3:39 pm
- Forum: Beginners Forum
- Topic: Titus 2:3 "καλοδιδασκάλους"
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1830
Re: Titus 2:3 "καλοδιδασκάλους"
If you are inclined to take καλοδιδασκάλους as masculine because of its second-declension ending, why not treat διαβόλους the same way? Rather, James has the correct answer. Enter διδάσκαλος into the Fléchir un lemme field at https://outils.biblissima.fr/fr/eulexis-web/ or διδασκάλους into the Lemma...
- December 24th, 2023, 8:40 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Common Hebraisms in LXX Greek?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1621
Re: Common Hebraisms in LXX Greek?
Following up on my previous question which Jason answered, I was wondering if someone has put together a list of common Hebraisms in the LXX that can help me in my reading of the LXX. Perhaps it's too detailed, but it sounds like you would appreciate Conybeare & Stock's Grammar of Septuagint Gr...
- December 20th, 2023, 11:48 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17721
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
Maybe someone with admission to the Göttingen Sept. could check that. Here's apparatus 1 for Genesis 14:13: 13 παραγεναμενος n 343 392 | τῶν ἀνασωθέντων / τις A D 814 911 15-72´-135´ 77 f−53 343 t y−346´ 424 z 55 59 = Sixt] τις (τι* vid) ανασ. 75; om τις Cyr I 353; tr Chr VII 326 Genn 1645 Arm rell...
- December 20th, 2023, 10:39 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17721
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
It’s not necessary that Chryststom himself changed to ομορος, possibly he had a manuscript with that reading: https://archive.org/details/oldtestamentingr01broouoft/page/34/mode/1up?view=theater Thanks for the reference. Am I reading the apparatus right, that the printed editions of Chrysostom &quo...
- December 20th, 2023, 10:23 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17721
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
https://www.zotero.org/groups/14909/sep ... /4B9GF53K/
Wevers, John William. 1993. Notes on the Greek text of Genesis. Vol. 35 of Septuagint and cognate studies. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
- December 18th, 2023, 8:44 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17721
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
FWIW, John Chrysostom reads the genitive case here, in Homilies on Genesis 35.12.
- December 17th, 2023, 7:02 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17721
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
Brayford depends on Wevers.
- December 17th, 2023, 2:54 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 17721
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
Here's Wevers' comment on this.