Search found 906 matches

by MAubrey
August 8th, 2018, 6:20 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: Finding Old Greek-Latin Lexicons
Replies: 11
Views: 1072

Re: Finding Old Greek-Latin Lexicons

I don't know whether Ryan has included Latin, but the best online source for ancient lexica is Ryan Baumann's:

https://dcthree.github.io/ancient-greek-lexica/
by MAubrey
July 27th, 2018, 1:18 pm
Forum: Syntax and Grammar
Topic: "Prepositional Phrases" and Syntax
Replies: 6
Views: 670

Re: "Prepositional Phrases" and Syntax

Thats really helpful, thanks for your reply. I take it from your response that technically both are possible—because you had to provide argumentation to demonstrate why your reading of the passage (and mine) was the correct option. I wouldn't even take the accordance diagrammer's analysis as even t...
by MAubrey
July 8th, 2018, 9:06 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: 2 Cor 8:24 - main verb of ἐνδεικνύμενοι?
Replies: 14
Views: 1158

Re: 2 Cor 8:24 - main verb of ἐνδεικνύμενοι?

Two options from my perspective:

(1) there is no verb simply because the clause the participial clause depends on has a non-verbal predicate.
(2) this is a sentence fragment produced in normal speech.
by MAubrey
July 8th, 2018, 9:03 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: 2 Cor 8:24 - main verb of ἐνδεικνύμενοι?
Replies: 14
Views: 1158

Re: 2 Cor 8:24 - main verb of ἐνδεικνύμενοι?

Looks like the manuscript tradition sees the same issue that you do.
by MAubrey
June 19th, 2018, 3:29 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11
Replies: 19
Views: 2881

Re: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11

The idea is not implausible, I can say that. The 19th century grammarians did not have the advantage of the documentary papyri. I wonder if the claim holds up if those are taken into account? Thackeray cites Mayser for the papyri, but he doesn't provide much data for the question: https://archive.o...
by MAubrey
June 17th, 2018, 5:39 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11
Replies: 19
Views: 2881

Re: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11

And neither does LSJ give any indication that different spellings of the perfect have different transitivities. Were you looking at the entry for ἐξίστημι? At least under ἵστημι different forms are given, including ἕστακα in the Causal section, together with indication of occurrences of some of its...
by MAubrey
June 9th, 2018, 6:31 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11
Replies: 19
Views: 2881

Re: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11

Then I looked more carefully at what is said in the quote. I checked Winer-Schmiedel and discovered there a footnote referring to transitive examples in LXX. See the latter part of footnote 4 in https://archive.org/stream/grammatikdesneu00schmgoog#page/n138/mode/2up On checking 1 Sam 15.12 in Rahlf...
by MAubrey
June 8th, 2018, 3:48 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11
Replies: 19
Views: 2881

Re: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11

Often this kind of thing traces back to one influential person who originally made the claim, but I'm not about to ferret that one out. In this case, I think it's being done without thought or awareness of the issue. The SIL Exegetical Summary on Acts 1-14 doesn't even make mention of it. And they'...
by MAubrey
June 8th, 2018, 2:02 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11
Replies: 19
Views: 2881

Re: ἐξίστημι in Acts 8:11

It's intransitive. ἱστήμι and its derivatives are causative in the present and anticausative in the perfect. So: ἵστημι <> ἕστηκα make stand <> am standing ὑφίστημι <> ὑφέστηκα make formed <> am formed ἀφίστημι <> ἀφέστηκα make go away <> am away Likewise: ἐξίστημι <> ἐξέστηκα make amazed <> am amaz...