Search found 19 matches
- March 24th, 2012, 9:51 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13714
Re: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
I was citing the Logos morphology. Using Logos, the Gramcord morphology shows no future perfects in the LXX.
- March 23rd, 2012, 11:49 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13714
Re: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
The κραζω confusion isn't limited to future/future perfect. Bernard Taylor's database, which parses all the reduplicated future forms as future perfects, parses several other reduplicated forms as aorists: κεκράξαι vb 1aor act inf ....κράζω κεκράξαντες vb 1aor act part masc nom pl ...id. κεκράξατε v...
- March 23rd, 2012, 11:03 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13714
Re: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
Right, Logos parses κεκλήσεται in Lev 13:45 as a future passive, although they have it right in Hosea 12:1. I've reported the mistake.
- March 23rd, 2012, 10:36 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 13714
Re: Future Perfect forms in LXX?
Here are the search results from Logos. It doesn't have forms of οιδα, which it parses as futures: Job 19:7 ἰδοὺ γελῶ ὀνείδει καὶ οὐ λαλήσω, κεκράξομαι, καὶ οὐδαμοῦ κρίμα. LXX-R Psalm 21:3 ὁ θεός μου, κεκράξομαι ἡμέρας, καὶ οὐκ εἰσακούσῃ, καὶ νυκτός, καὶ οὐκ εἰς ἄνοιαν ἐμοί. LXX-R Psalm 29:9 πρὸς σέ...
- March 4th, 2012, 3:25 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Supplemental Lexicon of the Septuagint
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9322
Re: Supplemental Lexicon of the Septuagint
Chamberlain’s supplemental lexicon was devised to fill the gap between LSJ and BDAG, since both resources have inadequate coverage of LXX vocabulary and word usage. It was specifically designed to build on BDAG, supplementing its numbering system where there is coverage in both lexicons. (An index s...
- October 20th, 2011, 7:55 am
- Forum: Unicode and Fonts
- Topic: unicode with windows 7
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12212
Re: unicode with windows 7
The installation of language keyboards is essentially the same in Windows 7 as it was with XP. Logos has a set of utilities you can download with excellent documentation that you might find helpful:
http://www.logos.com/support/downloads/keyboards
http://www.logos.com/support/downloads/keyboards
- August 29th, 2011, 11:11 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Supplemental Lexicon of the Septuagint
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9322
Re: Supplemental Lexicon of the Septuagint
Since Chamberlain has no separate treatment of κράζω (or κεκράγω), the presumption is that he considers the treatment in BDAG to be adequate; i.e., that ἐκέκραξα, which LSJ says is "frequent in LXX," is an alternate aorist form of κράζω.
- August 26th, 2011, 10:38 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: Supplemental Lexicon of the Septuagint
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9322
Re: Supplemental Lexicon of the Septuagint
I edited the book for Hendickson, so I’m more than a little biased. Nevertheless, I must say that I am impressed with the carefulness and comprehensiveness with which Chamberlain has done his work. Chamberlain believes LXX Greek is just “fundamental Greek.” By that he means that with the obvious exc...
- June 25th, 2011, 11:56 am
- Forum: Seen on the Web
- Topic: Learning English Glosses ≠ Learning Greek Words
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2313
Re: Learning English Glosses ≠ Learning Greek Words
Jonathan,
Can you provide the source for the Lewis quote? I know I've read it before, but I'm not sure where. Is it perhaps from his Studies in Words? I found this a delightful read some years ago.
Can you provide the source for the Lewis quote? I know I've read it before, but I'm not sure where. Is it perhaps from his Studies in Words? I found this a delightful read some years ago.