Search found 611 matches

by Eeli Kaikkonen
February 5th, 2022, 5:09 am
Forum: Unicode and Fonts
Topic: Ancient Greek OCR
Replies: 13
Views: 17734

Re: Ancient Greek OCR

Don't be fooled to skip to the conclusion, because in the middle of that article is an update with a link to a later post:

https://ntgreeketal.com/2021/03/27/ocr- ... tesseract/
by Eeli Kaikkonen
February 3rd, 2022, 10:58 am
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

I think you are painting yourself to some corner. I don't know what corner it is because the painting is so complicated, messy and baffling. I don't think your final conclusions follow from what Meyer says. You seem to be confusing grammar with formal logic. You ignore rhetorical generalizations and...
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 31st, 2022, 12:32 pm
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

According to the more common understanding, it used to be that the only flesh redeemable by the Law were those who lived in Palestine . Now however, all flesh is justified by faith in Jesus Christ, as his churches are being established all over the world." This itself needs interpretation. I s...
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 31st, 2022, 10:57 am
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

cf 1 Cor 1:29 (ὅπως μὴ καυχήσηται πᾶσα σὰρξ ἐνώπιον τοῦ Θεοῦ). μὴ καυχήσηται negates the idea that "all flesh" will boast before God. But it does not rule out the possibility of some despised "flesh" appropriately boasting in weakness as Paul himself does (2 Cor 11:30). Paradoxi...
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 31st, 2022, 8:50 am
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

Stephen Carlson wrote: January 31st, 2022, 7:06 am
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: January 31st, 2022, 4:52 am Those who know Latin can tell how it has been translated in Vulgate.
It’s word-for-word.
Can you tell how the Latin readers would have understood it? Do Latin fathers comment on this?
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 31st, 2022, 4:52 am
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

All authorities this far seem to take this as "no one" or similar. I got curious about the said Monaghan. If I found the right person he's catholic. I looked at some catholic English translations and they translate as "no one". For example http://catholicbible.online/side_by_side...
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 30th, 2022, 8:13 pm
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

Siebenthal also says (p. 219) "agreeing with Hebrew usage". Does this mean we can't find grammatical or syntactic rules for this? I wonder if there's some specific allusion to the OT behind this or these, especially οὐ... πᾶσα σὰρξ . The last two words together are certainly from the OT, r...
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 30th, 2022, 6:32 pm
Forum: Pragmatics and Discourse
Topic: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)
Replies: 30
Views: 11518

Re: οὐ... πᾶσα σάρξ (A discourse analysis of Gal 2:14b-16)

Of course you should study under what circumstances οὐ... πᾶσ is interpreted as "not all/every" instead of "no one", "nothing" etc. Have you done that?
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 26th, 2022, 5:29 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: John 21:17 "λέγει αὐτῷ τὸ τρίτον· Σίμων Ἰωάννου, φιλεῖς με (Joh 21:17 BGT)"
Replies: 24
Views: 7884

Re: John 21:17 "λέγει αὐτῷ τὸ τρίτον· Σίμων Ἰωάννου, φιλεῖς με (Joh 21:17 BGT)"

2)Luke 23:22 has the similar expression "ὁ δὲ τρίτον εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτούς (Luk 23:22 WHO)" but it seems to mean that it was the third time that Pilate said to them. When I examine the context, Pilate said different words the third time compared to the first time. This is more convincing. εἶπ...
by Eeli Kaikkonen
January 26th, 2022, 3:00 pm
Forum: New Testament
Topic: John 21:17 "λέγει αὐτῷ τὸ τρίτον· Σίμων Ἰωάννου, φιλεῖς με (Joh 21:17 BGT)"
Replies: 24
Views: 7884

Re: John 21:17 "λέγει αὐτῷ τὸ τρίτον· Σίμων Ἰωάννου, φιλεῖς με (Joh 21:17 BGT)"

1) John 21:16 uses "πάλιν δεύτερον·" to mean "the second time" or "a second time" but the content Jesus said to Peter this time "ἀγαπᾷς με (Joh 21:16 WHO)" is apparently different from the first time "ἀγαπᾷς με πλέον τούτων (Joh 21:15 WHO)". In the ...

Go to advanced search