I thought I just moved it.MAubrey wrote:That's fine. But I wish you hadn't removed my original post. I was trying to say something relevant to the theoretical issue at hand.Stephen Carlson wrote:I split off the discussion of the genitive in 2 Km 18:5 into its own thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1348
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest