σεαυτοῦ

σεαυτοῦ

Postby Louis L Sorenson » February 22nd, 2012, 10:40 pm

The BDAG lexicon gives σεαυτοῦ its own entry. A search of the online LSJ lexicon finds nothing about σεαυτοῦ. Why? (Smyth, of course, lists it fully under §329. Reflexive Pronouns.)

BDAG.
σεαυτοῦ (not σαυτοῦ [so Jos., Ant. 18, 336; Tat. 25, 1], B-D-F §31, 1 and 64, 1; Mlt-H. 180f; Rob. 287), ῆς (Alcaeus [c. 600 B.C.] et al.; pap, LXX, En, JosAs; ParJer 6:6; EpArist, Just., Tat.) reflexive pron. of the second pers. sing. (Kühner-Bl. I 596ff; B-D-F §283; W-S. §22, 11; Rob. 687–90) used only in the gen., dat., and acc. (on the replacement of σεαυτοῦ by ἑαυτοῦ s. ἑαυτοῦ 1b) yourself
ⓐ gen. Mt 18:16 v.l.; J 1:22; 8:13; 9:17 א* P75 (EBammel, NTS 40, ’94, 455f); 2 Ti 4:11; Hv 3, 6, 7; m 1:2.
ⓑ dat. J 17:5; Ac 9:34; 16:28; Ro 2:5; Hm 3:5; 9:1b; 12, 3, 5f. Also λογίζεσθαι ἐν σεαυτῷ Hs 9, 2, 6 (a Semitism, cp. TestJob 2:3; Leutzsch, Hermas 486 n. 290).
ⓒ acc. Mt 4:6; 8:4; Mk 1:44; Lk 5:14; Ro 2:21; Gal 6:1; 1 Ti 4:16b; B 19:3; Dg 2:1; Hm 9:8.—On the quot. fr. Lev 19:18: Mt 19:19; 22:39; Mk 12:31; Lk 10:27; D 1:2, cp. Appian, Bell. Civ. 3, 75 §305: Pansa says to Octavian ἐγὼ τῷ σῷ πατρὶ φίλος ἦν ὡς ἐμαυτῷ; Vi. Aesopi W 31 P.: θέλω (q.v. 3b=love) αὐτὴν (his wife) ὡς ἐμαυτόν=ed. Eberh. I c. 8


Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., & Bauer, W. (2000). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed.) (917). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Louis L Sorenson
 
Posts: 588
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 9:21 pm
Location: Burnsville, MN, USA

Re: σεαυτοῦ

Postby Stephen Carlson » February 22nd, 2012, 11:14 pm

Louis L Sorenson wrote:A search of the online LSJ lexicon finds nothing about σεαυτοῦ. Why?


It's there:

LSJ p. 1587 wrote:σεαυτοῦ, -ῆς, also σαυτοῦ, -ῆς, Ion. σεωυτοῦ, ῆς, reflexive Pron. of 2nd pers., of thyself, etc., in masc. and fem. of gen., dat., and acc. sg., first in Alc.87, Pi.Fr.97, Hdt.1.45, 108; ἐν σαυτοῦ (v.l. -ῷ) γενοῦ contain thyself, S.Ph.950: rarely in neut., φίλον ξύλον, ἔγειρέ μοι σεαυτὸ καὶ γίγνου θρασύ E.Fr.693:—the Trag. use the longer form (but not so freq. as the shorter), S.Ant.547, OT312, etc.:—in pl. always separated, ὑμῶν αὐτῶν, etc.: and orig. separated in sg., as in Hom., who always has σοὶ αὐτῷ, σ’ αὐτόν; and so τὰ σ’ αὐτοῦ, τὰ σ’ αὐτῆς for τὰ σά αὐτοῦ, etc., v. σός I.3.—The separated forms, σοῦ αὐτοῦ, αὐτοῦ σοῦ, etc., were used in Att., not as reflexive, but as emphat. personal pronouns, cf. Pl.Grg.472b, A.Th.632.


Stephen
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D. (Duke, New Testament)
Stephen Carlson
 
Posts: 1899
Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
Location: Melbourne

Re: σεαυτοῦ

Postby Louis L Sorenson » February 23rd, 2012, 8:01 am

Thanks,

There must be a glitch in Perseus' LSJ index. Even the TLG LSJ's headword search does not bring up the entry. But the word is there. Chicago's LSJ includes it correctly. Odd.
Louis L Sorenson
 
Posts: 588
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 9:21 pm
Location: Burnsville, MN, USA


Return to Lexicons

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron