Page 11 of 11

Re: Concordance including all the versions?

Posted: June 15th, 2016, 7:05 am
by Stephen Hughes
How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/

Re: Concordance including all the versions?

Posted: June 15th, 2016, 7:26 am
by Alan Bunning
Stephen Hughes wrote:How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/
Right now it has it identified as an errant form of ουτοσ. I suppose I could just code it as an error. Do you have an alternative suggestion?

Re: Concordance including all the versions?

Posted: June 15th, 2016, 11:41 am
by Stephen Hughes
Alan Bunning wrote:
Stephen Hughes wrote:How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/
Right now it has it identified as an errant form of ουτοσ. I suppose I could just code it as an error. Do you have an alternative suggestion?
Do you have a range of error codes to assign errors to different classes?

Re: Concordance including all the versions?

Posted: June 15th, 2016, 2:04 pm
by Alan Bunning
Stephen Hughes wrote:
Alan Bunning wrote:
Stephen Hughes wrote:How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/
Right now it has it identified as an errant form of ουτοσ. I suppose I could just code it as an error. Do you have an alternative suggestion?
Do you have a range of error codes to assign errors to different classes?
I don't currently, but that is not a bad idea.

Re: Concordance including all the versions?

Posted: June 15th, 2016, 9:04 pm
by Stephen Hughes
It is not something that you need to think through from scratch. There are standard names for scribal errors which you could use as the basis for your error classification codes too. I think this one would be classified as "dittography".