Athanasius Contra Gentes

Barry Hofstetter
Posts: 1526
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 1:48 pm

Re: Athanasius Contra Gentes

Post by Barry Hofstetter » June 18th, 2019, 4:03 pm

Stirling Bartholomew wrote:
June 18th, 2019, 2:32 pm

Right. I can't be bothered to use my hard copies of LSJ and Lampe and I was trying to read Contra Gentes w/o using a computer. That may be a lost cause. My study of On The Incarnation was done entirely on my Mac. Don't like to spend hours a day facing the glowing screen. But w/o access to hyperlinked lexicons you are at an enormous disadvantage.
I don't miss flipping through the pages of the lexicon, not one bit. But they still look nice on the bookshelf, and in case of an extended power outage... :lol:

Having said that, though, I still find having a printed text gives me the best reading experience. So in reading the Iliad, I have the printed text, and simultaneously up on the glow screen. Doing Cicero's Pro Milone the same way for my extra-curricular Latin reading. But my NT and LXX readings often take place waiting for a bus or the like, because they require less attention than texts I haven't read before, and so I don't seem to mind doing it on the phone.
0 x


N.E. Barry Hofstetter
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
Χαίρετε ἐν κυρίῳ πάντοτε· πάλιν ἐρῶ, χαίρετε

Peng Huiguo
Posts: 31
Joined: April 28th, 2019, 2:02 am

Re: Athanasius Contra Gentes

Post by Peng Huiguo » June 19th, 2019, 1:50 am

>look nice on the bookshelf, and in case of an extended power outage
>having a printed text gives the best reading experience

We're talking about LSJ here though — thing's as big and heavy as a bag of bricks, and its print's eye-killing. If the power outage's in the end time, when lights wane and roads jam, God have mercy on the LSJ hoarder.
1 x

Stirling Bartholomew
Posts: 927
Joined: August 9th, 2012, 4:19 pm

Re: Athanasius Contra Gentes

Post by Stirling Bartholomew » July 17th, 2019, 1:48 pm

§ 4.1Ἀποστᾶσα τῆς τῶν νοητῶν θεωρίας, καὶ ταῖς κατὰ μέρος τοῦ σώματος ἐνεργείαις καταχρωμένη, καὶ ἡσθεῖσα τῇ τοῦ σώματος θεωρίᾳ καὶ ἰδοῦσα καλὸν ἑαυτῇ εἶναι τὴν ἡδονήν, πλανηθεῖσα κατεχρήσατο τῷ τοῦ καλοῦ ὀνόματι, καὶ ἐνόμισεν εἶναι τὴν ἡδονὴν αὐτὸ τὸ ὄντως καλόν· ὥσπερ εἴ τις, τὴν διάνοιαν παραπληγείς, καὶ ἀπαιτῶν ξίφος κατὰ τῶν ἀπαντώντων, νομίζοι τοῦτο εἶναι τὸ σωφρονεῖν.

§ 4.1 Having departed from the contemplation of the things of thought, and using to the full the several activities of the body, and being pleased with the contemplation of the body, and seeing that pleasure is good for her, she was misled and abused the name of good, and thought that pleasure was the very essence of good: just as though a man out of his mind and asking for a sword to use against all he met, were to think that soundness of mind. — J.H. Newman
At this point the author is in the middle of a lengthy discussion of the human fall into corruption. My question is about Greek philosophy. The conflict between τῆς τῶν νοητῶν θεωρίας and ἡσθεῖσα τῇ τοῦ σώματος θεωρίᾳ, where does this come from, Plato?
0 x
C. Stirling Bartholomew

EricSowell
Posts: 45
Joined: December 5th, 2011, 3:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Athanasius Contra Gentes

Post by EricSowell » July 19th, 2019, 12:29 am

I'm having a tough time finding a digitized version of the Greek text of this online. Anyone have a link?
0 x

Stirling Bartholomew
Posts: 927
Joined: August 9th, 2012, 4:19 pm

Re: Athanasius Contra Gentes

Post by Stirling Bartholomew » July 19th, 2019, 3:58 pm

EricSowell wrote:
July 19th, 2019, 12:29 am
I'm having a tough time finding a digitized version of the Greek text of this online. Anyone have a link?
Athanasius Contra Gentes
http://catholiclibrary.org/library/view ... nd=default

It appears that Athanasius' treatment of "the Fall" is also treated in Athanasius, De lncarn. § 4.4-§ 4.5 where the wording is somewhat different:
§ 4.4 Οὕτως μὲν οὖν ὁ Θεὸς τὸν ἄνθρωπον πεποίηκε, καὶ μένειν ἠθέλησεν ἐν ἀφθαρσίᾳ· ἄνθρωποι δὲ κατολιγωρήσαντες καὶ ἀποστραφέντες τὴν πρὸς τὸν Θεὸν κατανόησιν, λογισάμενοι δὲ καὶ ἐπινοήσαντες ἑαυτοῖς τὴν κακίαν, ὥσπερ ἐν τοῖς πρώτοις ἐλέχθη, ἔσχον τὴν προαπειληθεῖσαν τοῦ θανάτου κατάκρισιν, καὶ λοιπὸν οὐκ ἔτι ὡς γεγόνασι διέμενον· ἀλλ' ὡς ἐλογίζοντο διεφθείροντο· καὶ ὁ θάνατος αὐτῶν ἐκράτει βασιλεύων. Ἡ γὰρ παράβασις τῆς ἐντολῆς εἰς τὸ κατὰ φύσιν αὐτοὺς ἐπέστρεφεν, ἵνα, ὥσπερ οὐκ ὄντες γεγόνασιν, οὕτως καὶ τὴν εἰς τὸ μὴ εἶναι φθορὰν ὑπομείνωσι τῷ χρόνῳ εἰκότως.

§ 4.4 Thus, then, God has made man, and willed that he should abide in incorruption; but men, having despised and rejected the contemplation of God, and devised and contrived evil for themselves (as was said in the former treatise), received the condemnation of death with which they had been threatened; and from thenceforth no longer remained as they were made, but were being corrupted according to their devices; and death had the mastery over them as king. Romans 5:14 For transgression of the commandment was turning them back to their natural state, so that just as they have had their being out of nothing, so also, as might be expected, they might look for corruption into nothing in the course of time.

§ 4.5 Εἰ γὰρ φύσιν ἔχοντες τὸ μὴ εἶναί ποτε, τῇ τοῦ Λόγου παρουσίᾳ καὶ φιλανθρωπίᾳ εἰς τὸ εἶναι ἐκλήθησαν, ἀκόλουθον ἦν κενωθέντας τοὺς ἀνθρώπους τῆς περὶ Θεοῦ ἐννοίας καὶ εἰς τὰ οὐκ ὄντα ἀποστραφέντας, οὐκ ὄντα γάρ ἐστι τὰ κακά, ὄντα δὲ τὰ καλά, ἐπειδήπερ ἀπὸ τοῦ ὄντος Θεοῦ γεγόνασι, κενωθῆναι καὶ τοῦ εἶναι ἀεί. Τοῦτο δέ ἐστι τὸ διαλυθέντας μένειν ἐν τῷ θανάτῳ καὶ τῇ φθορᾷ.

§ 4.5 For if, out of a former normal state of non-existence, they were called into being by the Presence and loving-kindness of the Word, it followed naturally that when men were bereft of the knowledge of God and were turned back to what was not (for what is evil is not, but what is good is), they should, since they derive their being from God who IS, be everlastingly bereft even of being; in other words, that they should be disintegrated and abide in death and corruption.
I haven't found any discussion of Athanasius borrowing ideas from the Greeks.

postsript
Gerald Bray
For Athanasius, the soul and the Garden of Eden were both manifestations of God's grace towards man, which enabled him to rise above the animals and live in an environment where his basic needs would not be permitted to interfere with his contemplation of God. Adam fell because he turned his gaze away from God and allowed himself to be distanced by the material world-by his body especially. For this reason he lost the grace of God and lapsed into the corruption which was inherent in his flesh.
http://churchsociety.org/docs/churchman ... 1_Bray.pdf
0 x
C. Stirling Bartholomew

Stirling Bartholomew
Posts: 927
Joined: August 9th, 2012, 4:19 pm

Re: Athanasius Contra Gentes

Post by Stirling Bartholomew » July 19th, 2019, 4:38 pm

This isn't a discussion of doctrine.
I am looked for evidence that Athanasius is framing his discussion in a cognitive framework inherited from greek philosophy. In other words this is a question about semantics at the framework level. Very much a language issue. The contrast between the contemplation of God and the fixation on the body seems to represent something from a semantic frame that is inherited from elsewhere. But where?
0 x
C. Stirling Bartholomew

Post Reply