Page 3 of 3
Re: Romans 16.7 - "Natural Gender" and "Arbitrary Gender"?
Posted: November 20th, 2015, 12:06 pm
by Danny King
Stephen Carlson wrote:
Perhaps it's considered weird because it's neuter and the referent is female. Not so weird to a Greek used to neuter diminutives.
I've been looking for information on Greek diminutives and found an amazing 17 page article in the Journal of Biblical Literature. And it's free, too!
Re: Romans 16.7 - "Natural Gender" and "Arbitrary Gender"?
Posted: November 20th, 2015, 4:31 pm
by timothy_p_mcmahon
Danny King wrote:I've been looking for information on Greek diminutives and found an amazing 17 page article in the Journal of Biblical Literature. And it's free, too!
Can you post the link?
Re: Romans 16.7 - "Natural Gender" and "Arbitrary Gender"?
Posted: November 20th, 2015, 10:47 pm
by Danny King
timothy_p_mcmahon wrote:Danny King wrote:I've been looking for information on Greek diminutives and found an amazing 17 page article in the Journal of Biblical Literature. And it's free, too!
Can you post the link?
Here it is:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3264595?seq ... b_contents