Romans 10:14 - πῶς δὲ πιστεύσωσιν οὗ οὐκ ἤκουσαν;

How do I work out the meaning of a Greek text? How can I best understand the forms and vocabulary in this particular text?
Forum rules
This is a beginner's forum - see the Koine Greek forum for more advanced discussion of Greek texts. Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up.

When answering questions in this forum, keep it simple, and aim your responses to the level of the person asking the question.
John Kendall
Posts: 9
Joined: May 31st, 2011, 5:41 pm

Re: Romans 10:14 - πῶς δὲ πιστεύσωσιν οὗ οὐκ ἤκουσαν;

Post by John Kendall » November 4th, 2017, 3:42 pm

Stirling Bartholomew wrote:
November 4th, 2017, 2:45 pm
I took a fresh look at the rules on page 79, it looks like rule #2 is the one
Yes, indeed. If Danove is correct in his analysis of the larger patterns of usage, this provides an answer to the original poster's question.

John

Stirling Bartholomew
Posts: 640
Joined: August 9th, 2012, 4:19 pm

Re: Romans 10:14 - πῶς δὲ πιστεύσωσιν οὗ οὐκ ἤκουσαν;

Post by Stirling Bartholomew » November 5th, 2017, 2:50 pm

In a much less technical publication Robert M. Bowman Jr.[1] addresses the distinction between ἀκούω with the genitive and accusative. The discussion cites various contemporary new testament scholars as well as quoting from the standard grammars Robertson[2], Moulton, Winer and others. Fast forward to Page 9. This article it Is generally off-topic (apologetics) but contains some useful citations from standard grammatical reference works.

[1] Did They Hear What Paul Heard? Acts 9:7 and 22:9 Revisited
Robert M. Bowman Jr., pp. 9ff.

https://www.academia.edu/19770469/
Did_They_Hear_What_Paul_Heard_Acts_9_7_and_22_9_Revisited

[2]A slightly misquoted portion from A.T. Robertson p506,
Fading Distinction from Accusative. But it must not be assumed that it is wholly a matter of indifference whether the accusative or the genitive is used with a verb, though the accusative in the later Greek constantly made inroads on the genitive. Even in the old Greek much freedom existed…. But it is perfectly proper to appeal to the distinction in the cases in the apparent contradiction between ἀκούοντες μὲν τῆς φωνῆς (Ac. 9:7) and τὴν δὲ φωνὴν οὐκ ἤκουσαν (22:9). The accusative (case of extent) accents the intellectual apprehension of the sound, while the genitive (specifying case) calls attention to the sound of the voice without accenting the sense. The word ἀκούω itself has two senses which fall in well with this case-distinction, one ‘to hear,’ the other ‘to understand.’ Cf. οὗ οὐκ ἤκουσαν (Ro. 10:14) and μὴ οὐκ ἤκουσαν (Ro. 10:18). And yet the genitive can be used where the sense is meant, though not stressed, as ἤκουσα φωνῆς (Ac. 22:7), but ἤκουσεν φωνήν (Ac. 9:4; and 26:14).
C. Stirling Bartholomew

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest