Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Grammar questions which are not related to any specific text.

Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby Jason Hare » October 14th, 2012, 2:21 am

Galatians 4:18-20
καλὸν δὲ ζηλοῦσθαι ἐν καλῷ πάντοτε, καὶ μὴ μόνον ἐν τῷ παρεῖναί με πρὸς ὑμᾶς, τέκνα μου, οὓς πάλιν ὠδίνω μέχρις οὗ μορφωθῇ Χριστὸς ἐν ὑμῖν· ἤθελον δὲ παρεῖναι πρὸς ὑμᾶς ἄρτι, καὶ ἀλλάξαι τὴν φωνήν μου, ὅτι ἀποροῦμαι ἐν ὑμῖν.

Wallace lists this in his paper here as an instance of constructio ad sensum. Would you agree with this? Is it not more sensible that οὕς here is referring to ὑμᾶς rather than τέκνα μου?

Thanks for your feedback.
Jason A. Hare
Rehovot, Israel
Jason Hare
 
Posts: 378
Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 5:28 pm
Location: Rehovot, Israel

Re: Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby Stephen Carlson » October 14th, 2012, 3:01 am

I would agree with you Jason. A constructio ad sensum is not necessary here.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D. (Duke)
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Faculty of Theology, Uppsala
Stephen Carlson
 
Posts: 1810
Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
Location: Uppsala University

Re: Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby Jason Hare » October 14th, 2012, 3:20 am

Stephen Carlson wrote:I would agree with you Jason. A constructio ad sensum is not necessary here.


Thanks, Stephen. Hoping more will respond. Appreciate the feedback.
Jason A. Hare
Rehovot, Israel
Jason Hare
 
Posts: 378
Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 5:28 pm
Location: Rehovot, Israel

Re: Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby Jason Hare » October 14th, 2012, 3:41 am

Here is what Wallace says about it:

In Gal 4:19, Paul speaks of "my children, whom" (τέκνα μου οὕς), using the masculine relative pronoun to refer to the "children."


I also notice that in footnote 3 he gives some other examples:

See also, regarding τέκνον, Phlm 10 (παρακαλῶ σε περὶ τοῦ ἐμοῦ τέκνου, ὃν ἐγέννησα); 2 John 1 (τοῖς τέκνοις αὐτῆς, οὕς [in which the antecedent of the masculine οὕς is both a feminine singular and a neuter plural]). The word παιδίον is similar: cf. Mark 5:41 (κτρατήσας τῆς χειρὸς τοῦ παιδίου λέγει αὐτῇ), in which the feminine pronoun is bracketed by παιδίον and τὸ κοράσιον; Mark 9:24-26 (παιδίου... αὐτόν... νεκρός).


With Philemon 10, I would wonder if this isn't an issue of attraction to Ὀνήσιμον.

2 John 1 is covered by Smyth §1055, where it says that "[w]hen the persons are of different gender, the masculine prevails." Would this be subsumed under ad sensum?

Mark 5:41 is certainly an instance, with the switch from τὸ παιδίον to αὐτῆς.

Mark 9:24-26 also offers an true example.

Does anyone else have anything to offer regarding the original verse that he referenced (Galatians 4:19)?
Jason A. Hare
Rehovot, Israel
Jason Hare
 
Posts: 378
Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 5:28 pm
Location: Rehovot, Israel

Re: Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby timothy_p_mcmahon » October 14th, 2012, 4:07 am

I think your proposal that οὕς refers to ὑμᾶς is plausible, especially with τέκνα being a vocative, but I wonder if the Wortfeld relationship of ὠδίνω with τέκνα makes τέκνα the likelier antecedent.
timothy_p_mcmahon
 
Posts: 133
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:47 pm

Re: Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby Jason Hare » October 14th, 2012, 4:24 am

timothy_p_mcmahon wrote:I think your proposal that οὕς refers to ὑμᾶς is plausible, especially with τέκνα being a vocative, but I wonder if the Wortfeld relationship of ὠδίνω with τέκνα makes τέκνα the likelier antecedent.


Could you explain what a Wortfeld relationship is?
Jason A. Hare
Rehovot, Israel
Jason Hare
 
Posts: 378
Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 5:28 pm
Location: Rehovot, Israel

Re: Galatians 4:19 - Constructio ad sensum?

Postby Stephen Carlson » October 14th, 2012, 8:08 am

Jason Hare wrote:Could you explain what a Wortfeld relationship is?


Wortfeld = Semantic field
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D. (Duke)
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Faculty of Theology, Uppsala
Stephen Carlson
 
Posts: 1810
Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
Location: Uppsala University


Return to Grammar Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest