Morphologies?

Forum for discussing biblicalhumanities.org projects related to biblical Greek.
Post Reply
Jonathan Robie
Posts: 3057
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Morphologies?

Post by Jonathan Robie » December 15th, 2013, 12:26 pm

Are there morphologies that we should be considering?

Is this still worth converting?

A philological introduction to Greek and Latin for students (1883)
Author: Baur, Ferdinand Christian, 1792-1860; Paul, C. Kegan (Charles Kegan), 1828-1902
https://archive.org/details/philologicalintr00baurrich

I assume that the German is less accessible for most people ... if you had to pick between the German original and a translation, which way would you go, and why?
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/

Ken M. Penner
Posts: 715
Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:50 am
Location: Antigonish, NS, Canada
Contact:

Re: Morphologies?

Post by Ken M. Penner » December 16th, 2013, 2:56 pm

Jonathan Robie wrote:Is this still worth converting?

A philological introduction to Greek and Latin for students (1883)
Author: Baur, Ferdinand Christian, 1792-1860; Paul, C. Kegan (Charles Kegan), 1828-1902
https://archive.org/details/philologicalintr00baurrich

I assume that the German is less accessible for most people ... if you had to pick between the German original and a translation, which way would you go, and why?
It's worth converting, and the English is preferable in this case.
Ken M. Penner
St. Francis Xavier University

Stephen Carlson
Posts: 2545
Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Morphologies?

Post by Stephen Carlson » December 17th, 2013, 9:33 am

I'm afraid this work is quite out-of-date. For example, it claims that the aorist sigma ending comes from the verb to be (e.g. ἐσ- τί), which no one has believed for a very long time.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia

Jonathan Robie
Posts: 3057
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
Location: Durham, NC
Contact:

Re: Morphologies?

Post by Jonathan Robie » December 17th, 2013, 10:26 am

Are there any morphologies that are more or less current, but old enough to be out of copyright (before 1923, or author died at least 70 years ago?)
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/

Stephen Carlson
Posts: 2545
Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Morphologies?

Post by Stephen Carlson » December 17th, 2013, 5:00 pm

For morphology, I get by using Smyth. If one is interested in the Koine period morphology, no reference will be up-to-date unless it takes into account the papyri that was published throughout the 20th century. So ideally one would want Gignac or maybe Mussies. But yeah, the copyright cut-off is rather unfortunate for us.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest