I have a question about this verse: Does the perfect passive κέκριται imply that the judgement is the unbelief itself? Thoughts?John 3:18 wrote: ὁ δὲ μὴ πιστεύων ἤδη κέκριται,
John 3:18 Perfect Passive
Forum rules
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 2:17 pm
John 3:18 Perfect Passive
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
When you say "judgement" do you mean what someone has been found guilty of, like in a sort of outcome of a trial process?Dwayne Green wrote:I have a question about this verse: Does the perfect passive κέκριται imply that the judgement is the unbelief itself? Thoughts?John 3:18 wrote: ὁ δὲ μὴ πιστεύων ἤδη κέκριται,
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 2:17 pm
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
Hi Stephen, when I say judgement, I am referring to the "sentence passed" upon a guilty person. Perhaps this is the wrong idea here?Stephen Hughes wrote:When you say "judgement" do you mean what someone has been found guilty of, like in a sort of outcome of a trial process?
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: June 2nd, 2011, 7:49 am
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
I don't think that the Greek text can give an answer to that question any more than a translation can. It's all about context.Dwayne Green wrote:Does the perfect passive κέκριται imply that the judgement is the unbelief itself?
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
You might like to consider if the perfect (which you have mentioned) implies an automaticity or a process.Dwayne Green wrote:Hi Stephen, when I say judgement, I am referring to the "sentence passed" upon a guilty person. Perhaps this is the wrong idea here?Stephen Hughes wrote:When you say "judgement" do you mean what someone has been found guilty of, like in a sort of outcome of a trial process?
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: May 9th, 2011, 10:11 am
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
As you already noted, κέκριται is a PASSIVE. This means that the subject is being acted upon. In this passage the subject is ὁ μὴ πιστεύων. It is therefore the one who does NOT believe who is judged. Nothing is said regarding what constitutes the judgmentὁ δὲ μὴ πιστεύων ἤδη κέκριται
george
gfsomsel
… search for truth, hear truth,
learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth,
defend the truth till death.
- Jan Hus
gfsomsel
… search for truth, hear truth,
learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth,
defend the truth till death.
- Jan Hus
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: May 6th, 2011, 1:48 pm
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
In short, Duayne, nothing in the form of the verb itself tells what constitutes the judgment. That it is perfect tells us that the unbeliever already is in state of judgment, that it is passive tells us that the subject is receiving the action. To determine the nature of the judgment itself requires further information to be supplied.
N.E. Barry Hofstetter, M.A., Th.M.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
Dwayne Green wrote:Does the perfect passive κέκριται imply that the judgement is the unbelief itself?
I'm still struggling to understand what you are asking in this question.Dwayne Green wrote:Hi Stephen, when I say judgement, I am referring to the "sentence passed" upon a guilty person. Perhaps this is the wrong idea here?Stephen Hughes wrote:When you say "judgement" do you mean what someone has been found guilty of, like in a sort of outcome of a trial process?
By "the sentence passed", do you mean that unbelief (ἀπιστία) is the punishment (τιμωρία) of which the condemned man is deemed worthy in a condemnation (κρίσις - in the sense of where a guilty verdict is reached), rather than the charge (ἔγκλημα) for which somebody needs to stand trial for, and in this case the crime for which trial has already been stood?
Is your question a sort of geek (sic.) question like, does 2 + 3 = 3 + 2 ? That is to say, does ὁ δὲ μὴ πιστεύων ἤδη κέκριται, = ὁ δὲ αἴτιος (guilty) ἀδικήματος (a bad deed) οὐ μὴ πιστεύετω. That is to say are you asking whether the perfect can place the articular participle to a place in the sequence of the verbs action, which comes after the end of the perfect's effect? That is to say is not believing the thing that comes after the judgement not before... If that is what you are asking, then I'm sorry, I don't know. My Greek is really rather poor - and especially the grammar of the perfect and sequences of tenses - but I hope that by working on it day by day, I might see some improvement in it over time.
To understand the things around this question, it might be useful to give some attention to some small details (λεπτομέρεια - but not in that "consisting of small particles" sense given in LSJ, but in the sense of meaning 2 of the related adjective λεπτομερής), which when I do it often perhaps ends up with making insignificant things bigger than they deserve to be in a given context (ie. λεπτομεριμνία), but still it might be interesting to note:
The word κρίνειν... The word κέκριται here can, but does not necessarily, imply a guilty verdict. Look at this interesting verse
A classical parallel could also be useful to contextualise the ἤδη used in this verse;Deuteronomy 25:1 wrote:ἐὰν δὲ γένηται ἀντιλογία (dispute) ἀνὰ μέσον ἀνθρώπων καὶ προσέλθωσιν εἰς κρίσιν καὶ κρίνωσιν καὶ δικαιώσωσιν τὸν δίκαιον καὶ καταγνῶσιν τοῦ ἀσεβοῦς
Lysias 27:3 (last phrase) wrote:καὶ οὐ νῦν πρῶτον ὤφθησαν ἀδικοῦντες, ἀλλὰ καὶ πρότερον ἤδη δώρων (genitive of the crime for which they were condemned) ἐκρίθησαν.
And this is not the first time that they have been caught in criminal acts: they have been tried before now for taking bribes. (Lamb's translation from the Loeb)
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 2:17 pm
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
This along with your quote from Deut. 25:1 helped me to see the difference between a judgement and a judicial sentence (ie punishment). I mixed up the two, seeing a sentence where there wasn't one. Given the idea of the perfect tense, A judgement is passed then a sentence comes later. Which of course, one could exit this state by simply believing and avoid the punishment all together.Stephen Hughes wrote:The word κρίνειν... The word κέκριται here can, but does not necessarily, imply a guilty verdict. Look at this interesting verse
I suppose this is more interpretational, but I think the perfect lends some credence to this. Am I completely off the wall here?
-
- Posts: 3323
- Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Re: John 3:18 Perfect Passive
Totally off Greek and beyond my competency, permit me to make the simple observation that in different legal systems the same words would mean different things. I didn't want to clutter that last post with that, but I suppose we could consider it now.Dwayne Green wrote:This along with your quote from Deut. 25:1 helped me to see the difference between a judgement and a judicial sentence (ie punishment). I mixed up the two, seeing a sentence where there wasn't one. Given the idea of the perfect tense, A judgement is passed then a sentence comes later. Which of course, one could exit this state by simply believing and avoid the punishment all together.Stephen Hughes wrote:The word κρίνειν... The word κέκριται here can, but does not necessarily, imply a guilty verdict. Look at this interesting verse
I suppose this is more interpretational, but I think the perfect lends some credence to this. Am I completely off the wall here?
In a system where punishments are prescribed by law and unchanging, then guilt is punishment for all intents and purposes. In a system where a finding of guilty is followed judicial sentencing then judgement is distinct from punishment. In a system where judgement is only passed in the case when someone is guilty, then judgement implies guilt and infers that punishment will quickly follow.
The point being that just because something is written in Greek doesn't give us such and so knowledge of the legal system involved. It is an issue where a knowledge of Greek helps considerably in formulating good questions, but doesn't directly answer them. It being open to interpretation that you mentioned may be better considered as being open to broader considerations of the legal system employed or referred to.
The classical example I put for you was to show the possible meaning of words rather than to imply that Athenian legal practice was somehow being used in different periods of Israelite history, or under Ptolemaic or Roman rule in one area or another.
None of this helps with your question about the perfect though.
Γελᾷ δ' ὁ μωρός, κἄν τι μὴ γέλοιον ᾖ
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)
(Menander, Γνῶμαι μονόστιχοι 108)