Would you please comment on Luke 23:54 and 56. In 54 we have the anarthrous SABBATON and in 56 we have the definite article which I presume is anaphoric. In other words "the Sabbath" in verse 56 is that Sabbath, the one mentioned without the article in verse 54. Would you concur?
Thank you.
Luke 23:54, 56
Forum rules
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: May 6th, 2011, 1:48 pm
Re: Luke 23:54, 56
It helps to cite the actual Greek:anthonybuzzard wrote:Would you please comment on Luke 23:54 and 56. In 54 we have the anarthrous SABBATON and in 56 we have the definite article which I presume is anaphoric. In other words "the Sabbath" in verse 56 is that Sabbath, the one mentioned without the article in verse 54. Would you concur?
Thank you.
54 καὶ ἡμέρα ἦν παρασκευῆς, καὶ σάββατον ἐπέφωσκεν. 55 Κατακολουθήσασαι δὲ αἱ γυναῖκες, αἵτινες ἦσαν συνεληλυθυῖαι ἐκ τῆς Γαλιλαίας αὐτῷ, ἐθεάσαντο τὸ μνημεῖον καὶ ὡς ἐτέθη τὸ σῶμα αὐτοῦ, 56 ὑποστρέψασαι δὲ ἡτοίμασαν ἀρώματα καὶ μύρα. Καὶ τὸ μὲν σάββατον ἡσύχασαν κατὰ τὴν ἐντολήν...
I don't know that I'd say that the article is specifically anaphoric here, but it's pretty clear from context that the same Sabbath day is in view.
N.E. Barry Hofstetter, M.A., Th.M.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: July 25th, 2011, 12:31 pm
Re: Luke 23:54, 56
Thanks for your reply. Another NT Greek scholar said "it probably is anaphoric." Is there any reason for saying it is not definitely anaphoric, granted that commonsense suggests the same sabbath, of course. But sabbaton "sabbath" followed by "ton sabbaton" seems rather naturally anaphoric.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Re: Luke 23:54, 56
I also think it is not an anaphoric article because generally omission of the article like in Luke 23:54 is allowed when the context makes it clear that only one thing is being referred to. Notice that "ἡμέρα" is also anarthous but it is clear it is referring to "the day" of which the author is currently speaking, the day after which being "the sabbath after". Therefore verses 54 and 56 are simply referring to the same sabbath, rather than one to another.anthonybuzzard wrote:Would you please comment on Luke 23:54 and 56. In 54 we have the anarthrous SABBATON and in 56 we have the definite article which I presume is anaphoric. In other words "the Sabbath" in verse 56 is that Sabbath, the one mentioned without the article in verse 54. Would you concur?
Thank you.
δαυιδ λιμ