Some weather words in Aristotle's Meteorologica

Forum rules
This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.

Some weather words in Aristotle's Meteorologica

Postby Stephen Hughes » July 16th, 2013, 8:06 am

cwconrad wrote:The treatises of Aristotle are thought to be lecture notes; the difficulty in reading them has always seemed to me to be ambiguities of referents of pronoun, relative pronoouns especially.

I'm reading the Meteorologica at present to be able to better fulfill a request put to me by another party. That work doesn't seem to be too difficult to follow the pronouns in.
Stephen Hughes
Grammatical analysis of the Bible:
Is the Bible literal? Yes, it's triliteral. BiBLe.
Is it aorist? No, it only has 27 books.
Is it perfect? No, it's imperfect. It's still works.
Is it nominal? No, it's committed. It attends all services.
Stephen Hughes
 
Posts: 778
Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Location: China

Re: Some weather words in Aristotle's Meteorologica

Postby cwconrad » July 16th, 2013, 11:01 am

I'm glad you're having good weather for a bon voyage through the Meteorologica. I can still remember my undergraduate initial experience with the Ethica Nicomachea decades ago, and working later through the Physics and Metaphysics.
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἄτοπον, ἔφη, λέγεις εἰκόνα καὶ δεσμώτας ἀτόπους.
ὁμοίους ἡμῖν, ἦν δʼ ἐγώ. Plato, Rep. 7 (515a)
cwconrad
 
Posts: 1131
Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:52 pm
Location: Burnsville, NC 28714

Re: Some weather words in Aristotle's Meteorologica

Postby Stephen Hughes » July 18th, 2013, 1:59 am

The aspect that I find most difficult is the "other" scientific system at work behind the text. It is logical enough in the terms that it is presented, but not making a distinction between "physical changes" and "chemical changes" that is assumed within the now current scientific thinking takes some getting used to.

I wonder how much of this scientific understanding was accepted by the writers in the hellenised world of the Koine Sprachbund.
Stephen Hughes
Grammatical analysis of the Bible:
Is the Bible literal? Yes, it's triliteral. BiBLe.
Is it aorist? No, it only has 27 books.
Is it perfect? No, it's imperfect. It's still works.
Is it nominal? No, it's committed. It attends all services.
Stephen Hughes
 
Posts: 778
Joined: February 26th, 2013, 7:12 am
Location: China


Return to Other

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest