There's a discussion going on at the BLT blog regarding whether ανθρωπος (in the singular) can refer to an individual female.
http://bltnotjustasandwich.com/2013/09/ ... a-goddess/
The author quotes Herodotus Histories 1.60, which describes a woman as τὴν ἄνθρωπον.
However, it's interesting to note that the article is feminine even though the ending is masculine/neuter. I don't know if it is common to use a feminine article with ανθρωπος. Because of the feminine article, I'm unsure whether we should treat this as a concrete counter-example. The fact that the article changed gender makes me think that the author deliberately avoided using τον ανθρωπον.
Are there other clear examples of ανθρωπος being used for individual females? Is the article used masculine or feminine?
ανθρωπος for individual females
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: ανθρωπος for individual females
This usage is mentioned in LSJ:
Because ἄνθρωπος is a noun, not an adjective, its ending does not mark gender.II. as fem., woman, Pi.P.4.98, Hdt.1.60, Isoc.18.52, Arist.EN1148b20; contemptuously, of female slaves, Antipho1.17, Is.6.20, etc.; with a sense of pity, D.19.197.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:50 am
- Location: Antigonish, NS, Canada
- Contact:
Re: ανθρωπος for individual females
The ending on ἄνθρωπος is not masculine/neuter. It is second declension. The feminine article with ἄνθρωπος is not so rare as the one cited example (from BDAG) implies.
BDAG begins the entry:
Josephus has τὴν ἄνθρωπον three times in Ant. 15, and four times in Ant. 18. τῆς ἀνθρώπου in Ant 5.9; 16.7; 18.9; 19.1; Wars 1.29; 110.
The plural τὰς ἀνθρώπους in Antiquities 17.34
This happens dozens of times in the classical authors as well.
BDAG begins the entry:
LSJ has:ἄνθρωπος, ου, ὁ (Hom.+; loanw. in rabb.; ἡ ἄνθρωπος [Hdt. 1, 60, 5] does not appear in our lit.) ‘human being, man, person’.
Philo has τὴν ἄνθρωπον in On Abraham 94, referring to a woman. τῆς ἀνθρώπου in Opif 75; 87; Leg 2.11; Plant 20; Abr 247.II. as fem., woman, Pi.P.4.98, Hdt.1.60, Isoc.18.52, Arist.EN1148b20; contemptuously, of female slaves, Antipho 1.17, Is.6.20, etc.; with a sense of pity, D.19.197.—Prop. opp. θηρίον, cf. ἀνήρ; but opp. γυνή, ἀπὸ ἀνθρώπου ἕως γυναικός LXX1Es.9.40, etc., Myc. a-to-ro-qo.
Josephus has τὴν ἄνθρωπον three times in Ant. 15, and four times in Ant. 18. τῆς ἀνθρώπου in Ant 5.9; 16.7; 18.9; 19.1; Wars 1.29; 110.
The plural τὰς ἀνθρώπους in Antiquities 17.34
This happens dozens of times in the classical authors as well.
Ken M. Penner
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Co-Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Co-Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org