From: Eric Weiss (eweiss@acf.dhhs.gov)
Date: Mon Oct 23 1995 - 11:33:32 EDT
Thanks for the response. It seems to me, though, that what Zerwick (p. 17,
45, not 46) and Young are saying is that the traditional view (i.e.,
"subterranean") is NOT correct.
Zerwick does define this genitive as:
..."epexegetic" genitive or genitive of apposition (i.e., in which
the substantive added in the genitive is in reality an apposition
denoting the same person or thing as the substantive to which the
genitive is attached, as in the English usage "city of Rome," with
which contrast the Latin "urbs Roma")... (45)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:30 EDT