From: Timster132@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 06 1995 - 00:02:29 EST
In a message dated 95-12-04 14:47:57 EST, kenneth@sybase.com (Kenneth Litwak)
writes:
> Isn't it circular to argue that since Mark doesn't use nai, Mark didn't
>use nai?
Actually, the argument is that NAI is not found among the Marcan
vocabulary, so it adds to the suspicion about the variant reading.
Tim Staker
Timster132@aol.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:33 EDT