Re: b-greek-digest V1 #32 /inerrancy

From: Timster132@aol.com
Date: Fri Dec 08 1995 - 13:59:13 EST


Subject: Re: b-greek-digest V1 #32 /inerrancy

Timster132@aol.com wrote...
>> Here you are totally wrong and in danger of hell-fire. If someone is a
>>scholar, but rejects CHRIST that person is nothing more than a fool.
>> Rejecting Christ and rejecting the doctrine of inerrancy are not the same
>>thing at all.
>> Your equating inerrancy with the Son of God is disturbing.

  From: Eric Vaughan <jevaughan@sauaca.saumag.edu>
  Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 11:08:58 CST
>Anyone who doesn't believe in the inerrancy of the scriptures DOESN'T
believe
>in Christ, or God for that matter. Part of believing in Christ, is
believing
>his divinity, which includes the characteristic of omnipotence. How could
an
>omnipotent being fail at anything, including giving us a nonerrant
scripture?

>I think you may be confused on what it may mean to believe in Christ.

  Actually, my understanding of what it means to believe in Christ is
simpler. It is a simple trusting God for salvation.
  Paul warned against those who would add requirements to salvation
by faith in Christ. He had to contend with those who made gentiles
become jewish first and accept all the Jewish laws before they could
be Christians.
  Your demand that I adhere to your theological doctrines of
omnipotence of Christ and the inerrancy view of inspiration is similar.
  God has forgiven me, and there's nothing you can say that will make
me change my mind about that.

   EN XRISTWi,

   Tim Staker
   Timster132@aol.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:34 EDT