From: Richard Lindeman (richlind@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Mon Dec 11 1995 - 09:01:45 EST
I have noted that there appears to be a merging or mixing of some
categories in uses of participles. Forinstance, many participles it
seems, when *following* a transitive verb, can be translated just as if
they were periphrastic. Even though the copulative verb is absent, it
seems as if a transitive verb within itself carries the force of the
verb eimi. I have difficulty classifying all of these participles as
being circumstantial.
It also seems that when the participle *follows* a verb it is
associated with that this participle often seems to have the impact of
"supplementing" the meaning of that verb. I am tempted at such times
to call the participle supplementary instead of circumstantial. In
contrast, when the participle *precedes* the verb that it is
associated with it has the impact of "anticipating" the meaning of that
verb.
Rich Lindeman
-- ======================================================================= International Society of Online Christians "Meeting the future boldly with Christ!" RichardLindeman@xc.org 2155 Northdale Blvd NW - Coon Rapids, MN 55433 =======================================================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:34 EDT