Re: EGKRAZW?

From: Carlton Winbery (winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net)
Date: Tue Dec 19 1995 - 13:08:02 EST


>On Mon, 18 Dec 1995, Carlton Winbery wrote:
>
>> In Acts 24:21 Paul said PERI MIAS TAUTHS FWNHS hHS _EKEKRAXA_ EN AUTOIS
>> "concerning this cry which _I cried out_ among them . . ." My question is
>> this. Could EKEKRAXA be from a verb spelled EGKRAZW instead of being an
>> irregular form of the verb KRAZW as it is given in BAGD, Thayer, Louw &
>> Nida, etc.? In the morphology (Brooks and Winbery, p. 425) we followed
>> BAGD and listed two forms of the 3rd principal part of KRAZW. Could this
>> not be a compound with the prep. EK added to the front of the verb without
>> changing its essential meaning, only intensifying it? I do not have L&S
>> here at home to check it, but does anyone know of any non-NT use of such a
>> word outside the 3rd pp.?
>>
>LSJ has both EGKRAZW and EKKRAZW; I don't see how the form you
>cite could be from the former, since the G wd by N before a vowel,
>or the former, since there G wd be xi. Right?

Right. I suppose the best explanation is that this is a situation where
the whole first sylable reduplicates in the aorist as is indicated in the
Aland concordance and BAGD.

Carlton Winbery
Chair Religion/Philosophy
LA College,
Pineville,La
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net
winbery@andria.lacollege.edu
fax (318) 442-4996 or (318) 487-7425



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:37:34 EDT