From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Fri Aug 21 1998 - 16:32:11 EDT
<x-rich>At 12:55 PM -0700 8/21/98, Kyle Dillon wrote:
<excerpt>How do TOUTOS and EKEINOS differ in relation to their
antecedents and/or appositives? For example, if there are two possible
antecedents in a sentence, would EKEINOS refer to the former and TOUTOS
to the latter? In other words, when would TOUTOS be used instead of
EKEINOS (or vise versa)?
Kyle Dillon
</excerpt>
I think you must mean hOUTOS/hAUTH/TOUTO--those are the nom. sg. forms
of the demonstrative normally translated 'this' or 'this one.' This is
the one that will should TOUT- forms in the oblique cases of the m. and
n., TAUT- forms in the oblique cases of the f.
The tendency is for hOUTOS to refer to a noun that follows or is
nearest, while EKEINOS refers to a noun that precedes or is more
remote. If both demonstratives appear, then hOUTOS refers to the nearer
noun, EKEINOS to the more remote noun. Example: EPIFANEIS HSAN hO TE
DHMOSQENHS KAI hO KIKERWN, ALL' EKEINOS MEN hELLHN HN, hOUTOS DE
RWMAIOS. "Both Demosthenes and Cicero were illustrious, but the former
was a Greek, the latter a Roman."
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu OR cconrad@yancey.main.nc.us
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
</x-rich>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:39:56 EDT