From: Jonathan Robie (jonathan@texcel.no)
Date: Wed Dec 23 1998 - 19:55:00 EST
A rather long time ago, Carl Conrad wrote:
>BUT--the imperfect (indicative) retains one function in Koine that it had
>in Classical Attic: it is used in both protasis and apodosis of present
>counterfactual conditions. I've never been able to figure out a good reason
>why the indicative should function in Greek for a counterfactual
>condition--but of course the aorist indicative does so in past
>counterfactual conditions also.
Are imperfects in the protasis and apodosis always *present* counterfactual
conditions? Consider the following:
Matt 23:30
EI HMEQA EN TAIS hHMERAIS TWN PATERWN hHMWN, OUK AN HMEQA AUTWN KOINWNOI EN
TWi hAIMATI TWN PROFHTWN
Jonathan
jonathan@texcel.no
Texcel Research
http://www.texcel.no
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:11 EDT