Rom 12:2 part 2 - PARAKALW + Infinitive KAI Imperatives

From: JŸrg Buchegger (j.buchegger@datacomm.ch)
Date: Mon Jan 04 1999 - 04:12:54 EST


This is my second question on Rom 12:2:
2. What about the unusual continuing of the PARAKALW+Infinitive phrase (in
V.1) with the Imperatives in V.2? - Is it correct to say, that one would
expect Infinitves in V.2? What would you call this anomaly? A "oratio
variata" (Winer p.509f)?

Thank you for comments on this.
Juerg Buchegger

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:12 EDT