From: Jim West (jwest@Highland.Net)
Date: Tue Jan 05 1999 - 12:11:52 EST
At 03:43 PM 1/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Here is a follow-up to my last question.
>
>How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
>CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60,
Nope.
> Thiede's Matthew frag at 60,
Nope.
< Luke frag at 90,
Nope.
> and John frag at 110)?
Yup.
>
>On the flip side, what are the earliest Aramaic fragments, and the
>strength of evidence for an early dating of those frags?
They aint none.
>
>Jeramy Townsley
Jim
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West, ThD
Quartz Hill School of Theology
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:13 EDT