From: Nichael Cramer (nichael@sover.net)
Date: Tue Jan 05 1999 - 17:51:43 EST
jtownsle@iupui.edu wrote:
> How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
> CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60, Thiede's Matthew frag at 60, Luke
> frag at 90, and John frag at 110)?
Jeramy
To answer your question quickly: These datings are accepted by virtually
no textual scholars outside of a very small handful; i.e. O'Callaghan,
Thiede and (maybe) a couple of others.
For an easily accessible discussion of why these datings are almost
certainly not correct, check out Graham Stanton's "Gospel Truth?".
Cheers
Nichael
-- Nichael Cramer work: ncramer@bbn.com home: nichael@sover.net http://www.sover.net/~nichael/--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:13 EDT