Re: aramaic New Testament

From: Nichael Cramer (nichael@sover.net)
Date: Tue Jan 05 1999 - 17:51:43 EST


jtownsle@iupui.edu wrote:

> How well accepted is it that we have Greek Gospel fragments from pre-100
> CE (O'Callaghan's Mark fragment @60, Thiede's Matthew frag at 60, Luke
> frag at 90, and John frag at 110)?

Jeramy

To answer your question quickly: These datings are accepted by virtually
no textual scholars outside of a very small handful; i.e. O'Callaghan,
Thiede and (maybe) a couple of others.

For an easily accessible discussion of why these datings are almost
certainly not correct, check out Graham Stanton's "Gospel Truth?".

Cheers
Nichael

--
Nichael Cramer
work: ncramer@bbn.com
home: nichael@sover.net
http://www.sover.net/~nichael/

--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:13 EDT