From: Jim Beale (beale@uconect.net)
Date: Sat Jan 16 1999 - 13:50:07 EST
At 6:15 AM -0600 1/16/99, Carl W. Conrad wrote:
>I think, if I've understood the sense of the Greek rightly, that hEAUTOIS
>would have been the more classical formulation and also clearer than EIS
>hEAUTOUS, which may reflect a Semitism. Certainly in terms of traditional
>grammatical constructions, if EIS hEAUTOUS were meant to construe
>attributively with THN BOULHN it should have another article (THN EIS
>hEAUTOUS BOULHN)--but surely the phrase must construe adverbially with
>HQETHSAN: they rejected it as something not applying to or obligating
>themselves.
Hi Carl,
Doesn't EIS + accusative function as a pure dative here?
It seems to me that it does. Robertson and BDF both
classify it as such. A dative of reference would seem
to be equivalent to your construction, wouldn't it? Or
perhaps a dative of (dis)advantage would show greater
personal interest.
Jim
>->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->
A mystery is a problem which encroaches upon its own data,
invading them, as it were, and thereby transcending itself as
a simple problem. (Gabriel Marcel, On the Ontological Mystery)
<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:14 EDT