From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Thu Apr 22 1999 - 06:06:10 EDT
<x-rich>At 3:51 PM -0400 4/14/99, Bryan Rocine wrote:
>Dear Carl,
>
>you wrote:
>Bryan wrote:
>> >Here is about where my question comes in. If the passage does
indeed
>> >utilize a "rhetorical" present, I assume Paul anticipates his
readers
>won't
>> >have nearly so much trouble understanding the rhetorical usage as
all
>those
>> >commentators! Your suggestion that this passage may amount to an
example
>of
>> >the "historical present" is helpful. Is that my answer? Or can
the list
>> >point to other Greek literature in which a distinctly rhetorical
use of
>the
>> >present is found, not of the historical present per se, i.e., some
of
>that
>> >"quite a bit of ancient literary and rhetorical models that could
>illuminate
>> >the question."
>>
>> One other Pauline example of rhetorical usage of the present tense
in the
>> first person comes immediately to mind: 1 Cor 13: EAN TAIS GLWSSAIS
TWN
>> ANQRWPWN LALW KAI TWN AGGELWN ...
>
>But isn't 1 Cor 13:1-2 present *subjunctive* as made implied by v. 2's
EIDW,
>so that the whole construction is a protasis-apodosis construction?
I've kept this message in my active mailbox and have finally gotten
back to it; I'll agree with you about 1 Cor 13:1-2 about those present
tenses, although I think that this chapter as a whole DOES fall into
the category of rhetorical first person; although Paul shifts into the
third person in 13:4 to make AGAPH his subject, yet in 13:9-12 he
returns to the first person, using it first in the plural in 13:9 (EK
MEROUS GAR GINWSKOMEN KAI EK MEROUS PROFHTEUOMEN) but then into the
first singular in 13:11 (hOTE HMHN NHPIOS KTL). So I really do think we
have a rhetorical use of the first person here.
A comparable passage is Philippians 3:3ff, where Paul is indeed talking
about his own experience, to be sure, but appears to be using it in a
sense that he expects to be paradigmatic for those who hear his letter
been read aloud--so that I think this is really comparable to Romans 7
where the first-person experience transcends any MERELY
autobiographical significance.
What do you think?
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics/Washington University
One Brookings Drive/St. Louis, MO, USA 63130/(314) 935-4018
Home: 7222 Colgate Ave./St. Louis, MO 63130/(314) 726-5649
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
</x-rich>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:24 EDT