Re: Mt 19:9

From: Ben Crick (ben.crick@argonet.co.uk)
Date: Wed May 12 1999 - 23:00:59 EDT


On Wed 12 May 99 (13:54:50), dd-1@juno.com wrote:
> Please note the following:
>
> "hOS AN APOLUSHi THN GUNAIKA AUTOU MH EPI PORNEIA
> KAI GAMHSHi ALLHN MOICATAI"

 Dear Danny:

 Yes, I am familiar with Wenham's take on this issue. To me, it seems
 that we have a "logical conjunction" here; two propositions conjoined
 with the Boolean operator AND. So we have {[P] AND [Q]} = R :

 {[hOS AN APOLUSHi THN GUNAIKA AUTOU MH EPI PORNEIA]
       KAI
  [GAMHSHi ALLHN]}
     MOICATAI

 So on these grounds I would disagree with Wenham. IF someone divorces
 another BECAUSE OF adultery, and marries another: THEN s/he does NOT
 commit adultery.

 IF (P AND Q) THEN R; IF NOT-P AND Q THEN NOT-R. IYSWIM.

 ERRWSQE
 Ben

-- 
 Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
 <ben.crick@argonet.co.uk>
 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
 http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm

--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:26 EDT