From: Carl W. Conrad (cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 26 1999 - 18:04:36 EDT
<x-rich>At 3:43 PM -0500 6/26/99, Dennis M. Wells wrote:
<excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param>Hello B-Greekers,
I am presently working through Hebrews 11:4 to preach tomorrow (I
know, but we had VBS this week) Nonetheless, I was wondering about the
EINAI following the EMARTURHQH. While I do not think it affects
exegesis much, is the infinitive functioning as a direct object?
I think that the DIKAIOS is a predicate nominative. is the EINAI
making this emphatic or is it just a different way of formulating the
sentence? (by the way, I skimmed Wallace and the archives before
posting this - even Lane's Word commentary wasn't much help)
</fontfamily></excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param>
</fontfamily>It's really pretty straightforward EMARTURHQH EINAI
DIKAIOS = DIKAIOS HN hWS PISTEI EMARTURHQH; DIKAIOS is a predicate
nominative and EINAI is simply the infinitive of indirect statement
after a passive introductory verb: "he was attested by faith to be
righteous" = "it was attested by faith that he was righteous."
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University
Summer: 1647 Grindstaff Road/Burnsville, NC 28714/(828) 675-4243
WWW: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~cwconrad/
</x-rich>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:31 EDT