Re: [Fwd: Tense of TETAGMENOI in Acts 13:48]

From: James S. Murray (jsmurray@execpc.com)
Date: Sun Jul 04 1999 - 18:54:30 EDT


Daniel, Paul, Clayton, Moon-Ryul:

Thanks for setting me straight on this.

Jim

Jim Murray
Racine, WI

Daniel Ria–o wrote:

> >I would appreciate some help in understanding the use of verb tense in
> >dependent clauses. The text reads; ...KAI EPISTEUSAN OSOI HSAN
> >TETAGMENOI EIS ZWHN AIWNION. I take the dependent clause as an
> >adverbial relative clause, either of condition or possibly comparison
> >(yes?). Is the use of the periphastic pluperfect relative to the main
> >verb, implying the action occurred prior to the action of the main verb,
> >or is this only true with participles (non-periphrastic, that is)? I'm
> >just interested in the grammar, please.
>
> It is a *substantive* clause (the subject). From a syntactic point
> of view some people would prefer not to call here O(/SOI a relative, as
> long as a) it is the subject of his own subordinate clause, but, b) it has
> no antecedent or consecuent, either implicit or explicit. (In Spanish some
> call it a "relacionante", bit I don't know the English term)
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Daniel Ria–o Rufilanchas
> Madrid, Espa–a

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:32 EDT