Re: Double negatives

From: J.K. Aitken (jka12@cus.cam.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 18 1999 - 06:23:58 EST


On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, David Miller wrote:

> Thus, 10:18 (MH OUK HKOUSAN] should be read as follows: "Did they not heae?
  1 Cor 11:22 clearly expects the answer "yes" [MH GAR
> OIKIAS OUK EXETE EIS TO ESTHIEIN]. MH does not occur in the LXX, so I could
> not check the pattern there.

On a quick check MH occurs in the LXX 3048 times! Do you mean a particular
construction does not occur. Excuse resposnding to the minor point rather
than the major question...

Yours,

Jim Aitken

>
> So, my question is: Is there any evidence outside of Romans 10:19 to
> confirm (or negate) Morris' suggestion?
>
> Thank you!
>
> David Miller
> Hamilton, ON
>
>
>
> ---
> B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
> You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: jka12@cus.cam.ac.uk
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
> To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
>
>
>

-----------------
Faculty of Divinity,
University of Cambridge,
St. John's Street,
Cambridge. GB-CB2 1TW
UK
Tel. +44 1223 332587
------------------

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:45 EDT