Gal 5:17 - Comments aside

From: RHutchin@aol.com
Date: Fri Dec 31 1999 - 12:24:12 EST


I recently saw an article proposing that one read Gal 5:17 as--

hH GAR SARX EPIQUMEI KATA TOU PNEUMATOS....
(TO DE PNEUMA KATA THS SARKOS TAUTA GAR ALLHLOIS ANTIKEITAI)
...hINA MH hA EAN QELHTE TAUTA POIHTE.

and then presenting a defense for the position.

Regardless of the validity of the above position, but using it as an example,
how does the writer of Greek insert asides into an argument without having
the presence of those asides debated 2,000 years later to the detriment of
the argument?

Roger Hutchinson
RHutchin@AOL.com

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:52 EDT