Re: ane What is the lexically proven Aramaic word for Peter

From: Polycarp66@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 18:12:12 EST


In a message dated 3/23/2000 1:54:00 PM Central Daylight Time,
alpersso@pe.net writes:

<<
 Peter had the name "petros" before joining Christ, Mt 4:18, therefore it is
NOT just another translation of Cephas. If it were then surely in Jn 1:42 it
would be written "you shall be called petros which by interpretation is a
lithos."
>>

Did he really? Can we believe that the gospels are historically accurate in
that regard when we don't consider them to be historically accurate in other
respects?

gfsomsel

---
B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:41:02 EDT