[b-greek] Re: hUMAS, Eph 2.1

From: Jim West (jwest@highland.net)
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 09:52:12 EDT


At 03:20 PM 10/16/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Dear friends,
>
>Eph 2:1,
>KAI hUMAS ONTAS NEKROUS TOIS PARAPTWMASIN KAI TAS hAMARTIAIS hUMWN.
>
>Question: Why is hUMAS accussative? It seems to be the object of an implied
verb, but what verb?

ontas.

at least thats how it functions in this clause.
"you WERE dead in your trespasses and sins"

best,

jim
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"If life gives you a bowl of lemons, go find an annoying guy
with paper cuts. Make it worthwhile!"
     - Jack Handey


Jim West, ThD
http://web.infoave.net/~jwest


---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:38 EDT