[b-greek] Re: my closing James 2 clarification

From: Moon-Ryul Jung (moon@saint.soongsil.ac.kr)
Date: Fri Feb 16 2001 - 20:28:58 EST


Dear Alan,

YOu said:
> And take KAI OUK EK PISTEWS MONON roughly in the
> following way:
>
> and not only justified by X
> (but also justified by Y}
>
> X = faith
> Y = works

Could you explain how MONON does not modify EK PISTEWS but
the implied verb DIKAOUNTAI?

Even if we understand the verse to be as follows:

KAI OU DIKAIOUNTAI EK PISTEWS MONON,

I do not see how it would mean the same as follows:

KAI OU MONON DIKAIOUNTAI EK PISTEWS.

Moon
Moon-Ryul Jung
Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea

---
B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek
You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu
To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:51 EDT