On Thu 19 Oct 2000 (10:38:37 +0100), jad@ccir.ed.ac.uk wrote: > Could some kind person supply me with an English translation of Exodus > 21:22-23 in the LXX, which reads: > > (22) EAN DE MACWNTAI DUO ANDRES, KAI PATAXWSI GUNAIKA EN GASTRI > ECOUSAN, KAI EXELQH TO PAIDION AUTHS MH EXEIKONISMENON, EPIZHMION > ZHMIWQHSETAI: KAQOTI AN EPIBALHi hO ANHR THS GUNAIKOS, DWSEI META > AXIWMATOS. > > (23) EAN DE EXEIKONISMENON Hi, DWSEI YUCHN ANTI YUCHS, Sir Lancelot Brenton supplies his own translation, which reads: "22 And if two men strive and smite a woman with child, and her child be born imperfectly formed, he shall be forced to pay a penalty: as the woman's husband may lay upon him, he shall pay with a valuation. 23 But if it be perfectly formed, he shall give life for life," (I have taken the liberty to tidy up your transliteration). EPIZHMION ZHMIWQHSETAI is an imitation of the Hebrew emphatic construction with the Infinite Absolute, which we have here in the Hebrew text. The force of the Hebrew seems to be that if a woman intervenes to stop two men fighting each other, and she is thereby caused to go into labour and her child be born prematurely (but the child is perfectly formed and survives), then she is to be recompensed by a financial consideration demanded by the husband, and enforcible by appeal to the magistrates. Keil and Delitzsch have a footnote which reads: "The words W:YaTs:'uW Y:LaDeYHa are rendered by the LXX. KAI EXELQH TO PAIDION AUTHS MH EXEIKONISMENON, and the corresponding clause W:'iM 'aCoWN YiH:YeH by EAN DE EXEIKONISMENON Hi ; consequently the translators have understood the words as meaning the fruit, the premature birth of which was caused by the blow, if not yet developed into a human form, was not to be regarded in any sense a human being, so that the giver of the blow was only required to pay a pecuniary compensation, -- as /Philo/ expresses it, 'on account of the injury done to the woman, and because he prevented nature, which forms and shapes a man into the most beautiful being, from bringing him forth alive.' But the arbitrary character of this explanation is apparent at once; for YeLeD only denotes a child, as a fully developed human being, and not the fruit of the womb before it has assumed a human form. In a manner no less arbitrary 'aCoWN has been rendered by /Onkelos/ and the /Rabbins/ MoWTa', death, and the clause is made to refer to the death of the mother alone, in opposition to the penal sentence in vers 23,24, which not only demands life for life, but eye for eye, etc., and therefore presupposes not death alone, but injury done to particular members. The omission of LaHh, also, apparently renders it impracticable to refer the words to injury done to the woman alone." Keil & Delitzsch, /The Old Testament/, vol II, /The Second Book of Moses/, reprint, Grand Rapids MI, p 134f footnote). HTH ERRWSQE Ben -- Revd Ben Crick, BA CF 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK) http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm --- B-Greek home page: http://metalab.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [jwrobie@mindspring.com] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-327Q@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu