G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 UMass      29  635 117  237   0   4  62 104  185 101  36  50 105  18  296
94-95 UMass      30  679 166  302   1   1  83 129  186  74  37  54 103  24  416
95-96 UMass      33 1011 256  537   0   8 163 233  271  87  58  83 128  32  675
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           92 2325 539 1076   1  13 308 466  642 262 131 187 336  74 1387

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 UMass      21.9  49.4   0.0  59.6  6.4  1.2  1.7  3.6  0.6  10.2
94-95 UMass      22.6  55.0 100.0  64.3  6.2  1.2  1.8  3.4  0.8  13.9
95-96 UMass      30.6  47.7   0.0  70.0  8.2  1.8  2.5  3.9  1.0  20.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           25.3  50.1   7.7  66.1  7.0  1.4  2.0  3.7  0.8  15.1

General Info:
             Consensus Division I Player of the Year. Led UMass to
             the Final Four.
Comments:
             Camby made great strides in improving his offense
             this season. He's a versatile player, who's capable
             of playing all three front-court positions.
Summary:
             Camby might be the first player selected.

Marcus has always been a presence on the defensive end. But
what position does he play in the NBA? Small forward-his
dribbling skills aren't that impressive. PForward-needs upper
boby strength. Let's now ever mention the Center position.His
offensive game improved a lot this past season. Was a clutch
performer. Very intelligent ball player. 

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
94-95 Memphis    34 1170 198  353   0   1 107 171  345  90  50  75  71  26  503
95-96 Memphis    30 1058 207  382   0   1 109 169  313  78  35  56  59  40  523
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           64 2228 405  735   0   2 216 340  658 168  85 131 130  66 1026

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
94-95 Memphis    34.4  56.1   0.0  62.6 10.1  1.5  2.2  2.1  0.8  14.8
95-96 Memphis    35.3  54.2   0.0  64.5 10.4  1.2  1.9  2.0  1.3  17.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           34.8  55.1   0.0  63.5 10.3  1.3  2.0  2.0  1.0  16.0

General Info:
             Third Team AP All-American.
Comments:
             He's a quick jumper. He needs to add more post moves
             and get more comfortable playing with his back to the
             basket.
Summary:
             Wright is a tremendous athlete, who'll need to refine
             his skills. Should be selected in the 5-8 range of the
             first round.

Lorenzen Wright came to the University of Memphis as a player expected to rebound and 
defend, and leave the rest to David Vaughn.  Wright emerged early in his freshman season 
as an offensive force he wasn't supposed to be.    He finishes as the University of 
Memphis's 7th all-time leader in blocked shots, trailing 5 4-year players and a 3-year 
player(Vaughn).   He was the 3rd sophomore in school history to reach 1000 points(the 
other 2 were Keith Lee and Elliot Perry), and the 5th 2nd-year player to score 1000 
points(the others were Lee, Perry, Larry Finch, and Anfernee Hardaway).  He has a good 
15-foot jumper, but outside that, he isn't very accurate.  He has a 37.5-inch vertical 
leap, allowing him to get up higher than most people.  He played 1170 minutes his 
freshman season, and was probably close to or higher than that this past year.  He is 
very good in the open floor, and he will outrun the majority of the centers and power 
forwards he plays against.    In 64 career games with the Tigers, Wright scored in 63, 
and had double-digits in scoring in 53 to 55 games.  He had 10 or more rebounds 15 times 
his freshman season and probably about 20 times his sophomore season.  ONly weighing 230 
pounds, Wright needs to get a little more meat on his bones, but he looks a lot stronger 
than he did his freshman season.  A semi-liability may be free-throw shooting, where he 
is a 63.3% career shooter.  However, he has shown flashes of great free-throw shooting 
where he goes 80 to 90% for a few games, then goes back to 50%.  When he was on national 
TV, he was even better than normal, averaging 15.4 points, 9.3 rebounds, 2.1 blocks, and 
62% field goal pct. as a freshman when on national TV.  While I don't have game-by-game 
stats for this year with me, I can say they were as good or better than last year's.  
Despite facing constant double-teams as a sophomore , he conssistently pured in 10 to 20 
points and 8 to 15 rebounds per game.  He should go high in the first round, I see him 
going 6th to Dallas, but any team lacking a power forward or center after Marcus Camby 
is taken will most likely at least take a strong look at Wright.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
94-95 Louisville 29  841 153  279   2   6  88 164  210  60  37  45  78  17  396
95-96 Louisville 21  634 124  207   0   1  70 114  157  53  23  49  43  17  318
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           50 1475 277  486   2   7 158 278  367 113  60  94 121  34  714

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
94-95 Louisville 29.0  54.8  33.3  53.7  7.2  1.3  1.6  2.7  0.6  13.7
95-96 Louisville 30.2  59.9   0.0  61.4  7.5  1.1  2.3  2.0  0.8  15.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           29.5  57.0  28.6  56.8  7.3  1.2  1.9  2.4  0.7  14.3

General Info:
             Missed about half of his sophomore season, while the
             N.C.A.A. investigated his use of a car.
Comments:
             Walker is young and inexperienced, but he has a lot of
             potential. He has a good build, and can be a outstand-
             ing shot-blocker. He needs to improve his offensive
             skills.
Summary:   
             Walker is a possible lottery pick. He'll probably
             be selected in the 10-15 range.

No States

Jermaine O'Neal is a very athletic forward (chris morris-like athletic 
ability), with skills both of a small forward and a power forward.
He reminds me a little of Cliff Robinson, an athletic big guy who can 
play at three positions, can score inside but also able to step outside 
and take big forwards off the dribble (he's very quick for his size, and 
is also a great runner).

O'Neal long arms and great leaping ability, which makes his a force 
defensivelly. 
Offensively, he has ways to go: his jumper isnt good at the moment, he'll 
have trouble scoring on the blocks since he's not strong enough to pound 
people into deep post positions (even NBA small forwards can outmuscle 
him)...
He's very weak physically at this stage, and will never have shaquille 
O'Neal's frame, but he has great body, with potential to be very strong 
and muscular.

General Info:
             O'Neal is awaiting the results of his college entrance
             exams. Therefore, he may withdraw from the draft.
Comments:
             O'Neal has good skills, but he needs time to mentally
             and physically mature.

Summary:
             O'Neal is likely to be selected in the 15-25 range
             of the first round.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
93-94 UNLV       22  738 140  284   0   1 135 220  256  73  10  61  26  26  415
94-95 UNLV       21  737 116  238   1   4 124 186  209  60  26  76  10  18  357
95-96 CS-B       30  998 201  342   0   1 180 262  324  83  17 101  33  27  582
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           73 2473 457  864   1   6 439 668  789 216  53 238  69  71 1354

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
93-94 UNLV       33.5  49.3   0.0  61.4 11.6  0.5  2.8  1.2  1.2  18.9
94-95 UNLV       35.1  48.7  25.0  66.7 10.0  1.2  3.6  0.5  0.9  17.0
95-96 CS-B       33.3  58.8   0.0  68.7 10.8  0.6  3.4  1.1  0.9  19.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           33.9  52.9  16.7  65.7 10.8  0.7  3.3  0.9  1.0  18.5

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Alabama                     Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Alabama    14  155  16   31   0   1   3   6   32  20   4   9  14   1   35
93-94 Alabama    24  274  27   55   0   0  15  22   63  30   2  19  28   9   69
94-95 Alabama    33  479  47   93   0   0  21  38  120  52  19  36  68  10  115
95-96 Alabama    32 1173 186  355   0   1  61  98  299  74  30  61 156  21  433
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          103 2081 276  534   0   2 100 164  514 176  55 125 266  41  652

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Alabama               Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Alabama    11.1  51.6   0.0  50.0  2.3  0.3  0.6  1.0  0.1   2.5
93-94 Alabama    11.4  49.1   0.0  68.2  2.6  0.1  0.8  1.2  0.4   2.9
94-95 Alabama    14.5  50.5   0.0  55.3  3.6  0.6  1.1  2.1  0.3   3.5
95-96 Alabama    36.7  52.4   0.0  62.2  9.3  0.9  1.9  4.9  0.7  13.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           20.2  51.7   0.0  61.0  5.0  0.5  1.2  2.6  0.4   6.3

        Look at the players that 'Tide has produced over the past few years:
Antonio McDyess, Robert Horry, Keith Askins,  Derrick McKey, etc. --- and
you can out two and two together and figure out that Rogers is a good
athlete. After the departure of Antonio McDyess, Jason Caffey, and Jamal
Faulkner last year, Roy Rogers finally made it into the 'Tide's starting
lineup this season and came up big. Even in a limited role, Rogers always
showed that he could block shots. This year, with more playing time, Rogers
proved that there was more to his game. 

        Rogers' long arms, quick leaping ability, and good timing make him a
fantastic shot blocker with the ability to single handedly destroy an
opposing offense. His quickness around the basket also serves him well as a
offensive rebounder. 

        Rogers' biggest drawback is his lack of offense. His offense is
pretty much limited to putbacks and short jumpers. He hasn't yet shown the
ability to score on a consistent basis from the low block. However, his
quick feet and solid hands might turn him into a decent offensive player
with time and experience. In order to make the adjustment to the NBA, Rogers
will also need to bulk up his skinny frame.

        In the NBA, Rogers might make it as an 8th or 9th man coming off the
bench to provide help on defense. He reminds me a bit of Theo Ratliff of the
Pistons from last year's draft.

Rogers is an exceptional defensive player. Has proven he can play
against bigger players and NBA players (A. McDyess and J.Caffey).
His offense improved greatly from junior year to senior year when
he became the first option. People are comparing him to A. McDyess
but I think the comparision should be to A. Mourning. Small for
the Center position but not mobile enough for the Power Forward
position. Offensive seemed to of had problems when he was double
teamed. One on One, he seemed to measure up the defender very well.
Defensively will be small against the 5 best centers, but no
guards or forwards will drive the lane without being challenged.

General Info:
             Rogers was a reserve behind Antonio McDyess and Jason
             Caffey before he had the opportunity to start as a 
             senior. He had two triple-doubles(points, rebounds,
             and blocks) this season.
Comments:
             A terrific shot-blocker. Rogers has improved
             offensively. He likes to shoot hook shots.
Summary:     

             Rogers may be considered this year's version of
             Antonio McDyess. He could be a lottery pick.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Kansas     32  564  82  173   0   0  48  92  145  89  15  41   7  18  212
92-93 Florida                     Did Not Play - Transfer Student
93-94 Hutch JC   39  ... ...  ... ... ... ... ...  ... ...  55 ... ... ...  776
94-95 Arizona    21  440  85  158   0   0  38  60  124  53   8  34   5  11  208
95-96 Arizona    33 1039 171  313   0   0 127 184  313  91  23  77  21  20  469
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     86 2043 338  644   0   0 213 336  582 233  46 152  33  49  889

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Kansas     17.6  47.4   0.0  52.2  4.5  0.5  1.3  0.2  0.6   6.6
92-93 Florida
93-94 Hutch JC    ...  59.0 100.0  69.0 12.0  1.4  ...  ...  ...  19.9
94-95 Arizona    21.0  53.8   0.0  63.3  5.9  0.4  1.6  0.2  0.5   9.9
95-96 Arizona    31.5  54.6   0.0  69.0  9.5  0.7  2.3  0.6  0.6  14.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     23.8  52.5   0.0  63.4  6.8  0.5  1.8  0.4  0.6  10.3

I didn't see much of Ben Davis for his first two years, as he 
transferred from Kansas and then disappeared into the JC ranks.  
Reappearing the PAC-10, he finally developed into a consistent inside 
force for the latter half of his senior year.

Skills: Davis is a fearsome rebounder.  Although he is a bit of a 
tweener (6-8 I believe), he has an instinct for great positioning and 
getting the rebound. He also has a decent inside game, with putbacks 
and short jump shots.  However, he needs to become more aggressive 
mentally.  He finally became consistent when Joseph Blair was 
sidelined. But at that point, he was Arizona's only inside game, and 
could be double-teamed. This is where he had no clue as to find the 
open man, and as a result, threw away the ball a lot when he tried to 
pass. He also has no outside shot.

Outlook: Somewhat similar to Corliss Williamson when he came out, but 
is a little taller, which may appeal to some teams who need a backup 
power forward. Second round hopeful.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Arizona    28  453  86  132   0   0  28  47  107  33  12  28  10   5  200
93-94 Arizona    34  967 153  252   0   1  37  85  246  92  21  37  37  24  343
94-95 Arizona    28  723 142  254   0   0  53 114  195  77  25  53  31  20  337
95-96 Arizona    14  427  89  129   0   0  28  70  124  39  30  32  23  15  206
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          104 2570 470  767   0   1 146 316  672 241  88 150 101  64 1086

                 MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Arizona   16.2  65.2   0.0  59.6  3.8  0.4  1.0  0.4  0.2   7.1
93-94 Arizona   28.4  60.7   0.0  43.5  7.2  0.6  1.1  1.1  0.7  10.1
94-95 Arizona   25.8  55.9   0.0  46.5  7.0  0.9  1.9  1.1  0.7  12.0
95-96 Arizona   30.5  69.0   0.0  40.0  8.9  2.1  2.3  1.6  1.1  14.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          24.7  61.3   0.0  46.2  6.5  0.8  1.4  1.0  0.6  10.4

General Info:
             Blair had his senior season cut short when he was
             ruled academically ineligible.
Comments:
             He improved his stock at Nike Desert Classic. Scouts
             were impressed when he reported 20 pounds lighter than
             what he weighed while playing at Arizona. He averaged 
             15 ppg, 8 rpg, and was selected to the all-tournament
             team.
Summary:
             Blair seems to be determined in his quest for a pro
             career.

looks like a fatter Sean Rooks.  His strengths are a soft touch around
the basket and much improved post moves from early in his college
career.  His weaknesses seem to be lack of footspeed, lack of shot
blocking, and the propensity for getting silly fouls.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Florida    16   60   5   15   0   0   7  11    9   4   3   2   1   0   17
93-94 Florida    37  969 178  347   0   2 113 172  183 100  21  90   5  26  469
94-95 Florida    29  817 155  295   7  23  81 118  170  82  31  75  10  17  398
95-96 Florida    28  925 184  376  14  44 110 164  218  80  24  79  21  30  492
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          110 2771 522 1033  21  69 311 465  580 266  79 246  37  73 1376

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Florida     3.8  33.3   0.0  63.6  0.6  0.2  0.1  0.1  0.0   1.1
93-94 Florida    26.2  51.3   0.0  65.7  4.9  0.6  2.4  0.1  0.7  12.7
94-95 Florida    28.2  52.5  30.4  68.6  5.9  1.1  2.6  0.3  0.6  13.7
95-96 Florida    33.0  48.9  31.8  67.1  7.8  0.9  2.8  0.8  1.1  17.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           25.2  50.5  30.4  66.9  5.3  0.7  2.2  0.3  0.7  12.5

General Info:
             Arrived at Florida weighing over 350 pounds. He's been
             a solid contributor for three seasons. Primarily known
             for "Da Meat Hook".
Comments:
             Despite concerns about his mobility, Hill is
             underrated. He was MVP at NABC All-Star game at the
             Final Four.
Summary:
             He might not get drafted, but Dametri deserves an
             opportunity to play in the N.B.A.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Georgetown 33 1074 205  358   0   0 144 193  291  96  32  89  48  28  554
93-94 Georgetown 31  896 152  276   0   1 151 206  248 100  36  92  51  22  455
94-95 Georgetown 31  769 132  236   0   1 115 163  187  87  25  80  44  27  379
95-96 Georgetown 37  983 161  288   0   2 129 174  257  91  44  65  58  29  451
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          132 3722 650 1158   0   4 539 736  983 374 137 326 201 106 1839

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Georgetown 32.5  57.3   0.0  74.6  8.8  1.0  2.7  1.5  0.8  16.8
93-94 Georgetown 28.9  55.1   0.0  73.3  8.0  1.2  3.0  1.6  0.7  14.7
94-95 Georgetown 24.8  55.9   0.0  70.6  6.0  0.8  2.6  1.4  0.9  12.2
95-96 Georgetown 26.6  55.9   0.0  74.1  6.9  1.2  1.8  1.6  0.8  12.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           28.2  56.1   0.0  73.2  7.4  1.0  2.5  1.5  0.8  13.9

Othella Harrington came to Georgetown in 1992 as arguably the number one
prospect in the entire country. He seemed the complete big man, and
ready to carry the torch in the long line of great Georgetown centers.
He did that freshman year, leading the team in scoring and rebounding
while winning Big East rookie of the year honors. It only went downhill
from there. 

First his weaknesses. Despite his size, he is not much of a banger. He
has some post moves, but his lack of aggressiveness showed this year
when he was constantly overpowered on the blocks and outrebounded,
though part of that was due to the presence of Jerome Williams who is
possibly the best pure rebounder in the draft. The addition of Iverson
didn't help, as the Big O is a half court player who had a tough time
(especially last year) adjusting to the full court running game. To his
credit, much of his lower numbers can be attributed to the fact that he
was the ONLY low post player the Hoyas had and (oddly enough) the key to
there offense, so collapsing defenses concentrated on him denying him
room to operate.

Despite all this though, I love the Big O, and he has a great upside.
His mental game and positioning is excellent. He does have low post
moves and in the usually toned down, half-court, man-to-man defense
world of the NBA, he should flourish. He ain't fleet of foot, but can
move more than adequately, and as I said, the depressed numbers can be
mostly attributed to the reactions of defenses and the change of game
style Allen Iverson brought in with him. As a classic power forward he
is a good solid mold, and I expect him to do very well in the NBA.

A very strong rebounder who combines outstanding shooting talent 
with both an ability to draw fouls and consistent free throw 
shooting.  Had 6 double-doubles his Senior season to bring
his career total to 35.

Inconsistent at times at establishing inside position and 
aggressively moving to the basket.  His offensive game should thrive 
in the NBA where he will not face consistent double and triple 
teaming at the PF position and should be able to team up with a PG 
whose first option is to feed the ball to scorers.  An aggressive 
defender and team player.  Above average shot blocking skills.

a 6'7" player who will not play center in the NBA like he did at
Georgetown.  Great outside touch and shot.  Will and can make the 3
point shot in the pros.  That will have to be his strength because his
post moves pump faking 5 times in the paint and praying for the
defender to jump.  Won't block any shots, is a decent rebounder, and a
competitor who wants to win badly.

General Info:
             O'Neal is awaiting the results of his college entrance
             exams. Therefore, he may withdraw from the draft.
Comments:
             O'Neal has good skills, but he needs time to mentally
             and physically mature.

Summary:
             O'Neal is likely to be selected in the 15-25 range
             of the first round.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 E Central  30 1080 259  446   0   2  96 155  359 ...  55  59 ...  39  614
93-94 E Central  26  884 231  358   0   1 112 167  308 ...  57  51 ...  44  574
94-95 MVSU       27  807 192  349   0   0  68 114  317  47  24  38   9  30  452
95-96 MVSU       29 1010 251  415   1   2 126 197  394  62  45  76  29  39  629
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     56 1817 443  764   1   2 194 311  711 109  69 114  38  69 1081

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 E Central  36.0  58.1   0.0  61.9 12.0  1.8  2.0  0.0  1.3  20.5
93-94 E Central  34.0  64.5   0.0  67.1 11.8  2.2  2.0  0.0  1.7  22.1
94-95 MVSU       29.9  55.0   0.0  59.6 11.7  0.9  1.4  0.3  1.1  16.7
95-96 MVSU       34.8  60.5  50.0  64.0 13.6  1.6  2.6  1.0  1.3  21.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     32.4  58.0  50.0  62.4 12.7  1.2  2.0  0.7  1.2  19.3

General Info:
             Led the nation in rebounding, while averaging 21
             points per game. 
Comments:
             Provides the rebounding and shot-blocking expected
             from the PF position. 
Summary:
             He should develop into one of the premier rebounders
             in the N.B.A.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Drexel     29  820 144  287   0   0 107 190  330 111  10  75  24  13  395
93-94 Drexel     30  875 154  296   0   0 110 202  371 103  20  76  29  10  418
94-95 Drexel     30  984 216  384   0   3 152 213  404 103  36 102  38  34  584
95-96 Drexel     31  972 219  368   7  21 182 255  409  83  53  87  30  35  627
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          120 3651 733 1335   7  24 551 860 1514 400 119 340 121  92 2024

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Drexel     28.3  50.2   0.0  56.3 11.4  0.3  2.6  0.8  0.4  13.6
93-94 Drexel     29.2  52.0   0.0  54.5 12.4  0.7  2.5  1.0  0.3  13.9
94-95 Drexel     32.8  56.3   0.0  71.4 13.5  1.2  3.4  1.3  1.1  19.5
95-96 Drexel     31.4  59.5  33.3  71.4 13.2  1.7  2.8  1.0  1.1  20.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           30.4  54.9  29.2  64.1 12.6  1.0  2.8  1.0  0.8  16.9

Living on the West Coast, I don't see many Drexel games, but what I 
saw of them and Rose in the NCAA Tournament really impressed me. Rose 
and the Dragons first defeated Memphis and then put a scare into 
Syracuse before falling in the fourth quarter. 
Malik Rose may be extremely undersized (6-7) for a center, but he has 
a huge heart.  In the first game, he dominated Lorenzen Wright, who is 
an inside talent in his own right, and in the Syracuse game, he 
collected 10+ rebounds, even with an injured ankle (I think).

Skills: Rose can rebound. Just look at the fact that he averaged 
nearly 12 rebounds his entire career. Although he did this in a 
smaller conference, he held his own against Wright (excellent 
rebounder) who is by far the taller man. Rose is also a very good 
passer, with the ability to find the open man and cutters while he is 
positioned on the low post. His only problem is his height.  He is 
short enough to scare away most teams from trying him at PF, and he 
does not have SF skills. He *is* a very smart player, and maximizes 
his talent (low-post play, passing). He improved his FG% every year, 
although he has not really refined his inside moves.

Outlook: Even with his big height disadvantage, I still think Rose 
could be a steal for the team who picks him.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Georgia    29  711 112  235   0   0  43  84  164  90  33  62  15  35  267
93-94 Georgia    30  734 130  275   0   2  73 124  183 101  41  67   8  27  333
94-95 Georgia    28  737 144  304   9  25 100 148  193  93  37  53   8  14  397
95-96 Georgia    31  849 160  354   5  32  92 132  199  81  53  60   7  33  417
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          118 3031 546 1168  14  59 308 488  739 365 164 242  38 109 1414

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Georgia    24.5  47.7   ERR  51.2  5.7  1.1  2.1  0.5  1.2   9.2
93-94 Georgia    24.5  47.3   0.0  58.9  6.1  1.4  2.2  0.3  0.9  11.1
94-95 Georgia    26.3  47.4  36.0  67.6  6.9  1.3  1.9  0.3  0.5  14.2
95-96 Georgia    27.4  45.2  15.6  69.7  6.4  1.7  1.9  0.2  1.1  13.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           25.7  46.7  23.7  63.1  6.3  1.4  2.1  0.3  0.9  12.0

General Info:
             Highly regarded prep player, who had a mediocre
             college career. However, Strong had good performances
             at both the Portsmouth Invitational and the Nike     
             Desert Classic.
Comments:
             Strong is a good athlete, who can use his quickness
             to outplay bigger players.
Summary:
             I think Strong will be a "steal" in the early-mid
             second round.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Marquette  15  121   9   25   0   0   8  15   47  17   5   7  12   6   26
92-93 Marquette                   Did Not Play - Redshirted
93-94 Marquette  33  367  62   91   0   0  47  74  108  60  17  36  32   8  171
94-95 Marquette  33  946 134  262   1   3  85 129  279 102  26  73  76  14  354
95-96 Marquette  30  795 123  224   1   2  63  97  266 108  38  78  55  17  310
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          111 2229 328  602   2   5 203 315  700 287  86 194 175  45  861

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Marquette   8.1  36.0   0.0  53.3  3.1  0.3  0.5  0.8  0.4   1.7
92-93 Marquette             Did Not Play - Redshirted
93-94 Marquette  11.1  68.1   0.0  63.5  3.3  0.5  1.1  1.0  0.2   5.2
94-95 Marquette  28.7  51.1  33.3  65.9  8.5  0.8  2.2  2.3  0.4  10.7
95-96 Marquette  26.5  54.9  50.0  64.9  8.9  1.3  2.6  1.8  0.6  10.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           20.1  54.5  40.0  64.4  6.3  0.8  1.7  1.6  0.4   7.8

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 WSU        27  927 119  214  12  23  89 125  217  85  50  53   8  24  339
93-94 WSU        28  889  96  198  12  35  90 126  222  91  46  50  11  19  294
94-95 WSU        30  991 183  292  14  34 104 131  269  89  38  67  10  18  484
95-96 WSU        23  763 127  222   8  31 117 165  219  70  37  65   5  20  379
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          108 3570 525  926  46 123 400 547  927 335 171 235  34  81 1496

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 WSU        34.3  55.6  52.2  71.2  8.0  1.9  2.0  0.3  0.9  12.6
93-94 WSU        31.8  48.5  34.3  71.4  7.9  1.6  1.8  0.4  0.7  10.5
94-95 WSU        33.0  62.7  41.2  79.4  9.0  1.3  2.2  0.3  0.6  16.1
95-96 WSU        33.2  57.2  25.8  70.9  9.5  1.6  2.8  0.2  0.9  16.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           33.1  56.7  37.4  73.1  8.6  1.6  2.2  0.3  0.8  13.9

General Info:
             Hendrickson is a solid all-around player, who also
             is a pitcher for the baseball team.
Comments:
             He'll be able to draw defenders away from the basket
             to guard against his outside shot.
Summary:
             Has the talent to be a two-sport player.

Strengths: Fiery competitor,came back way too early with a broken hand
this year and was still the best player on the team by far, the injury
cost him the POY in the Pac-10. Can shoot, can score inside and is a solid
all around player. Good athlete, considered a ML baseball prospect as a
pitcher.

Weaknesses: A bit too small to play inside in the NBA, probably not quick
enough to be a full-time SF in the NBA. Needs to improve his range and
show scouts he can guard SF's.

Comments: Was a very good defender in college because he's very physical,
gave Ed O'Bannon fits early in his career, played Abdur-Rahim tough this
past year. He's a definite 100% type of guy. No idea where baseball fits
into the equation, allegedly throws 90MPH but hasn't ever concentrated on
baseball.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 DodgeCity                   Statistics Unavailable
93-94 SE Iowa                     Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Cincinnati 32  881 171  326   1   5  46  84  266 116  40  53  56  11  389
95-96 Cincinnati 33  813 124  277   0   4  48  85  296 102  21  48  50  27  296
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     65 1694 295  603   1   9  94 169  562 218  61 101 106  38  685

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 DodgeCity             Statistics Unavailable
93-94 SE Iowa               Statistics Unavailable
94-95 Cincinnati 27.5  52.5  20.0  54.8  8.3  1.3  1.7  1.8  0.3  12.2
95-96 Cincinnati 24.6  44.8   0.0  56.5  9.0  0.6  1.5  1.5  0.8   9.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     26.1  48.9  11.1  55.6  8.6  0.9  1.6  1.6  0.6  10.5

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Hagerstown                  Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Hagerstown                  Statistics Unavailable
94-95 VCU        30  896 172  294   0   2  68 117  254  95  66  87  17  40  412
95-96 VCU        33  964 224  400   2   6  88 142  333  91  73  94  15  32  538
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     63 1860 396  694   2   8 156 259  587 186 139 181  32  72  950

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Hagerstown            Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Hagerstown            Statistics Unavailable
94-95 VCU        29.9  58.5   0.0  58.1  8.5  2.2  2.9  0.6  1.3  13.7
95-96 VCU        29.2  56.0  33.3  62.0 10.1  2.2  2.8  0.5  1.0  16.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     29.5  57.1  25.0  60.2  9.3  2.2  2.9  0.5  1.1  15.1

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Westark                     Statistics Unavailable
92-93 Westark                     Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Baylor     24  808 187  369   0   1  71 138  355  72  20  48  23  26  445
94-95 Okla St                     Did Not Play - Transfer Student
95-96 Okla St    25  690 142  261   0   2  41  84  166  75  34  47  13  24  325
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     49 1498 329  630   0   3 112 222  521 147  54  95  36  50  770

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Westark               Statistics Unavailable
92-93 Westark               Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Baylor     33.7  50.7   0.0  51.4 14.8  0.8  2.0  1.0  1.1  18.5
94-95 Okla St               Did Not Play - Transfer Student
95-96 Okla St    27.6  54.4   0.0  48.8  6.6  1.4  1.9  0.5  1.0  13.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     30.6  52.2   0.0  50.5 10.6  1.1  1.9  0.7  1.0  15.7

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Canisius   25  832 126  278   7  22  72 113  178  70  25  63  45  39  331
93-94 Canisius   29  921 165  312  11  31 109 152  217  86  36  53  46  33  450
94-95 Canisius   35 1135 198  422  17  54 146 197  241 110  43  70  51  25  559
95-96 Canisius   30  975 168  366   9  43 142 182  202  83  46  82  41  28  487
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          119 3863 657 1378  44 150 469 644  838 349 150 268 183 125 1827

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Canisius   33.3  45.3  31.8  63.7  7.1  1.0  2.5  1.8  1.6  13.2
93-94 Canisius   31.8  52.9  35.5  71.7  7.5  1.2  1.8  1.6  1.1  15.5
94-95 Canisius   32.4  46.9  31.5  74.1  6.9  1.2  2.0  1.5  0.7  16.0
95-96 Canisius   32.5  45.9  20.9  78.0  6.7  1.5  2.7  1.4  0.9  16.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           32.5  47.7  29.3  72.8  7.0  1.3  2.3  1.5  1.1  15.4

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 UW         29  877 110  190   6   7  74  92  234  70  58  72  17  25  300
92-93 UW         27  868 106  201   5  20 112 130  217  64  34  58   9  29  329
93-94 Kentucky                    Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 Kentucky   33  728  89  173  21  44  72  99  207  96  29  43  38  24  271
95-96 Kentucky   37  731  96  197  17  46  73 107  190 100  37  49  44  37  282
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          126 3204 401  761  49 117 331 428  848 330 158 222 108 115 1182

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 UW         30.2  57.9  85.7  80.4  8.1  2.0  2.5  0.6  0.9  10.3
92-93 UW         32.1  52.7  25.0  86.2  8.0  1.3  2.1  0.3  1.1  12.2
93-94 Kentucky              Did Not Play - Transfer Student
94-95 Kentucky   22.1  51.4  47.7  72.7  6.3  0.9  1.3  1.2  0.7   8.2
95-96 Kentucky   19.8  48.7  37.0  68.2  5.1  1.0  1.3  1.2  1.0   7.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           25.4  52.7  41.9  77.3  6.7  1.3  1.8  0.9  0.9   9.4

        It may seem strange that a guy who didn't even start would be pro
        prospect to most, but for those who followed Kentucky and the wealth
        of talent they had on their team, they understand that Mark Pope is
        indeed an NBA type of prospect.  Mark Pope started out his career
        in fine fashion, finishing his freshman year at Washington as the
        Pac-10's freshman of the year in 91-92.  He built upon that year
        his sophomore season, again finishing with solid numbers.  However,
        with the departure of coach Lynn Nance, Pope grew disenchanted with
        the direction the program was heading and decided to transfer to
        Kentucky.

        During the year of the requisite year off, Pope impressed coaches
        and teammates alike with his spirited and rugged play in practice.
        Projected as a starter his first year in the program in 94-95,
        Pope started out as such, and for most of his career at UK, played
        at center for the Wildcats.  This past season saw Pope mostly come
        off of the bench, but he roughly saw the same amount of minutes as
        the previous season.

        Mark Pope offensively has a pretty nice game.  Nice soft shot which
        extends out to the 3-pt line, an inside game that features a few
        moves.  Pope's outside touch is attractive to NBA scouts/teams --
        his range extends out to that of the college 3-pt line, and he can
        certainly hit the shot when left open.  Inside, Pope can outdo
        smaller players, but does have problems with bigger ones.  Often
        times he'll take the ball strong to the hole, only to see his shot
        rejected into the second row.  Inbetween, Pope has a solid mid-range
        shot.  With all that said, however, Pope was a mystery from the FT
        line, especially in his senior season at Kentucky.  At Washington,
        he led the Pac-10 in FT shooting.  But at Kentucky, he sometimes
        was wildly inconsistent from the line.  Most likely, something
        mental that can be worked out.

        Defensively, Pope holds his own inside.  He has a strong body and
        isn't afraid to use it.  Pope hits the boards pretty well and can
        block a few shots.  He isn't the most athletic guy in the world, but
        can surprise on occasion (as shown by the alley-oop dunks he threw
        down in the NCAA tournament).  Pope is a fair passer.

        Positively, Pope can draw some comparisons to Frank Brickowski.
        He'll likely play PF in the pros, with some backup center in a
        pinch.  His aggressiveness is much of the same type that Andrew
        DeClercq had for Florida, and that won him a 2nd round selection.
        Pope figures to be in the same boat.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 State Fair                  Statistics Unavailable
92-93 State Fair                  Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Baylor                          Did Not Play
94-95 Kansas St  27  768 106  212   0   0  99 153  153  89  23  58  18  23  311
95-96 Kansas St  29  909 128  256   0   1 121 185  239  77  35  78  14  19  377
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     56 1677 234  468   0   1 220 338  392 166  58 136  32  42  688

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 State Fair            Statistics Unavailable
92-93 State Fair            Statistics Unavailable
93-94 Baylor                      Did Not Play
94-95 Kansas St  28.4  50.0   ERR  64.7  5.7  0.9  2.1  0.7  0.9  11.5
95-96 Kansas St  31.3  50.0   0.0  65.4  8.2  1.2  2.7  0.5  0.7  13.0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     29.9  50.0   0.0  65.1  7.0  1.0  2.4  0.6  0.8  12.3

Strengths: Probably should have been the POY in the Pac-10 after
Hendrickson got hurt, better overall year than Abdur-Rahim. Strong inside
player who dominated the glass after Joe Blair became ineligible, kept
Arizona in the conference race. Solid defender at the college level, tough
as nails.

Weaknesses: Probably a bit of a tweener, basically played C his last year
in college and was much more effective after Blair left the team and he
was able to become the only post threat, lacks an outside game. Sort of a
poor man's Oakley but has to develop the jumpshot like Oak did. Can't jump
a lick so NBA PF's may play over his head.

Comments: Davis played 2 years at Arizona after having cups of coffee with
Kansas, Florida and a JC, resurrected his career this year, but will
scouts be scared by his early vagabond days in college. Really a small C
but had a great senior year.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 MSU        14   55   2   15   0   1   1   4   20   7   1   4   1   2    5
93-94 MSU        32  506  38   69   0   2  20  41  104  53  23  22  11  12   96
94-95 MSU        28  875 111  180   0   0  54  93  281  62  29  46  12  26  276
95-96 MSU        32  986 116  268  20  65  71 115  303  73  75  69  14  24  323
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          106 2422 267  532  20  68 146 253  708 195 128 141  38  64  700

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 MSU         3.9  13.3   0.0  25.0  1.4  0.1  0.3  0.1  0.1   0.4
93-94 MSU        15.8  55.1   0.0  48.8  3.3  0.7  0.7  0.3  0.4   3.0
94-95 MSU        31.3  61.7   0.0  58.1 10.0  1.0  1.6  0.4  0.9   9.9
95-96 MSU        30.8  43.3  30.8  61.7  9.5  2.3  2.2  0.4  0.8  10.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           22.8  50.2  29.4  57.7  6.7  1.2  1.3  0.4  0.6   6.6

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Va Tech    27  ...  89  183   2   8  62  81  123  45  25  41   9  30  242
93-94 Va Tech    28  680 111  230  13  26  80 117  138  61  52  47   9  20  315
94-95 Va Tech    35  ... 206  433  11  43 137 203  234  97 102  64  33  48  560
95-96 Va Tech    29  ... 106  250  11  32 100 123  131  56  81  51   7  20  323
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          119  ... 512 1096  37 109 379 524  626 259 260 203  58 118 1440

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Va Tech    21.0  48.6  25.0  76.5  4.6  0.9  1.5  0.3  1.1   9.0
93-94 Va Tech    24.3  48.3  50.0  68.4  4.9  1.9  1.7  0.3  0.7  11.3
94-95 Va Tech    34.0  47.6  25.6  67.5  6.7  2.9  1.8  0.9  1.4  16.0
95-96 Va Tech    28.0  42.4  34.4  81.3  4.5  2.8  1.8  0.2  0.7  11.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS            ...  46.7  33.9  72.3  5.3  2.2  1.7  0.5  1.0  12.1

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Hutch JC   34  ... ...  ... ... ... ... ...  ... ...  49 ... ... ...  807
93-94 Hutch JC   39  ... ...  ... ... ... ... ...  ... ...  98 ... ... ...  880
94-95 Purdue     32  746 114  225  13  48  66 135  145  56  42  65  27  32  307
95-96 Purdue     32  778 110  187   5  20  42  84  161  65  61  79  25  50  267
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     64 1524 224  412  18  68 108 219  306 121 103 144  52  82  574

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Hutch JC    ...  52.0  37.0  62.0  8.5  1.4  ...  ...  ...  23.7
93-94 Hutch JC    ...  56.0  27.0  55.0  9.0  2.5  ...  ...  ...  22.6
94-95 Purdue     23.3  50.7  27.1  48.9  4.5  1.3  2.0  0.8  1.0   9.6
95-96 Purdue     24.3  58.8  25.0  50.0  5.0  1.9  2.5  0.8  1.6   8.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Div I TOTALS     23.8  54.4  26.5  49.3  4.8  1.6  2.3  0.8  1.3   9.0

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 Iowa                        Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Iowa       17  256  28   62   3   8  29  43   64  31   8  19   6  14   88
93-94 Iowa       27  604 108  213  15  49  71  97  142  59  36  62  11  21  302
94-95 Iowa       12  168  24   47   4  13  10  17   39  20  11  12   2   9   62
95-96 Iowa       32  861 151  248  22  50 115 144  225  91  29  52  25  38  439
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           88 1889 311  570  44 120 225 301  470 201  84 145  44  82  891

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 Iowa                  Did Not Play - Redshirted
92-93 Iowa       15.1  45.2  37.5  67.4  3.8  0.5  1.1  0.4  0.8   5.2
93-94 Iowa       22.4  50.7  30.6  73.2  5.3  1.3  2.3  0.4  0.8  11.2
94-95 Iowa       14.0  51.1  30.8  58.8  3.3  0.9  1.0  0.2  0.8   5.2
95-96 Iowa       26.9  60.9  44.0  79.9  7.0  0.9  1.6  0.8  1.2  13.7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           21.5  54.6  36.7  74.8  5.3  1.0  1.6  0.5  0.9  10.1

General Info:
             Millard had a mediocre career at Iowa. He did have a
             solid senior season, and he was named to the All-
             Tournament team at both the Portsmouth Invitational
             and the Nike Desert Classic.
Comments:
             Millard is a intriguing pro prospect. He can score
             down low or on the perimeter, and he's a better
             athlete than people realize.
Summary:
             Millard has improved his stock to first round range.

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 Iona       20  127  13   34   1   3   8  16   27  14   3  13   4   2   35
93-94 Iona       27  983 182  374   0   1 112 165  181  72  30  65  53  21  476
94-95 Iona       26  903 180  342   1   1  95 137  164  66  19  53  51  18  456
95-96 Iona       29  958 150  363   0   0  84 134  170  67  23  55  76  13  384
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          102 2971 525 1113   2   5 299 452  542 219  75 186 184  54 1351

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 Iona        6.4  38.2  33.3  50.0  1.4  0.2  0.7  0.2  0.1   1.8
93-94 Iona       36.4  48.7   0.0  67.9  6.7  1.1  2.4  2.0  0.8  17.6
94-95 Iona       34.7  52.6 100.0  69.3  6.3  0.7  2.0  2.0  0.7  17.5
95-96 Iona       33.0  41.3   0.0  62.7  5.9  0.8  1.9  2.6  0.4  13.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           29.1  47.2  40.0  66.2  5.3  0.7  1.8  1.8  0.5  13.2

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
91-92 PacChrist ...  ... ...  ... ... ... ... ...  ... ... ... ... ... ...  ...
92-93 LMU                         Did Not Play - Redshirted
93-94 LMU        23  531  65  116   0   0  44  70  172  82   5  39  39  17  174
94-95 LMU        28  788 130  224   0   0  93 168  251  95  18  65  27  27  353
95-96 LMU        29  819 139  226   0   0 114 184  255 101  11  87  26  19  392
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           80 2138 334  566   0   0 251 422  678 278  34 191  92  63  919

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
91-92 PacChrist   ...   ...   ...   ... 10.6  ...  ...  ...  ...   7.4
92-93 LMU                   Did Not Play - Redshirted
93-94 LMU        23.1  56.0   0.0  62.9  7.5  0.2  1.7  1.7  0.7   7.6
94-95 LMU        28.1  58.0   0.0  55.4  9.0  0.6  2.3  1.0  1.0  12.6
95-96 LMU        28.2  61.5   0.0  62.0  8.8  0.4  3.0  0.9  0.7  13.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           26.7  59.0   0.0  59.5  8.5  0.4  2.4  1.2  0.8  11.5

                  G  MIN  FG  FGA  3P 3PA  FT FTA  REB  PF AST  TO BLK STL  PTS
92-93 DePaul     30  422  62  120   0   2  20  32  106  68   6  24  19  13  144
93-94 DePaul     27  492  79  173   0   1  22  28  131  75  10  24  24  17  180
94-95 DePaul     28  838 138  276   1   2  58  97  208  89  18  49  19  26  335
95-96 DePaul     29  987 195  406   0   6  53  92  226  88  25  49  38  15  443
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          114 2739 474  975   1  11 153 249  671 320  59 146 100  71 1102

                  MIN   FG%   3P%   FT%  RPG  APG  TPG  BPG  SPG   PPG
92-93 DePaul     14.1  51.7   0.0  62.5  3.5  0.2  0.8  0.6  0.4   4.8
93-94 DePaul     18.2  45.7   0.0  78.6  4.9  0.4  0.9  0.9  0.6   6.7
94-95 DePaul     29.9  50.0  50.0  59.8  7.4  0.6  1.8  0.7  0.9  12.0
95-96 DePaul     34.0  48.0   0.0  57.6  7.8  0.9  1.7  1.3  0.5  15.3
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS           24.0  48.6   9.1  61.4  5.9  0.5  1.3  0.9  0.6   9.7