[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Human vs. natural influences on the environment



In <4vv6t5$q0@igc.apc.org> tomgray <tomgray@igc.apc.org> writes: 
>
>"D. Braun" <dbraun@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>My sentiments exactly. I was wondering, though, what is the best
method of
>>addressing the counter-intuitive reasoning of many who believe that
>>because global warming might not be occurring, or might not be "bad",
>>nothing needs to be done?
>

There's nothing counter-intuitive about it; it's common sense.

>Well, I favor trying reason, myself, at least as a first option.

*First* option!
And if reason is on *their* side (as it quite obviously is
in the example given above) - then try what? Deception? Force?
Brainwashing? 



Follow-Ups: References: