[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: The Limits To Growth
-
Subject: Re: The Limits To Growth
-
From: brshears@whale.st.usm.edu (Harold Brashears)
-
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 14:08:33 GMT
-
Article: 15948 of alt.sustainable.agriculture
-
Newsgroups: alt.agriculture.misc, alt.org.earth-first, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.greens, alt.save.the.earth, alt.sustainable.agriculture, sci.agriculture, sci.econ, sci.energy, sci.environment, talk.environment
-
Organization: University of Southern Mississippi
-
References: <542t7d$iep@rainbow.rmii.com> <32665F05.112@ilhawaii.net> <JMC.96Nov10090026@Steam.stanford.edu> <565ehv$qm9@agate.berkeley.edu> <01bbcf5b$bd8e1700$89d0d6cc@masher> <5692t9$5uf@news.telusplanet.net> <l.mcfadden-1211961031380001@dreamer-dog.pai.utexas.edu> <3288c92b.433092570@nntp.st.usm.edu> <l.mcfadden-1311961000390001@dreamer-dog.pai.utexas.edu> <328a0115.512954578@nntp.st.usm.edu> <56dde9$mvv@news.inforamp.net> <56fld3$5omj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de>
-
Xref: newz.oit.unc.edu alt.agriculture.misc:6389 alt.org.earth-first:6604 alt.politics.economics:92476 alt.politics.greens:23491 alt.save.the.earth:25618 alt.sustainable.agriculture:15948 sci.agriculture:15863 sci.econ:60221 sci.energy:58018 sci.environment:111594 talk.environment:76986
bds@ipp-garching.mpg.de (Bruce Scott TOK ) wrote for all to see:
[edited]
>: The book, a marvellous tale if only because of his story of his
>: marking off territory by pissing on rocks, wolf style, when he lived
>: in the wild to study them, exculpated wolves from attacks on caribou,
>: said that they lived on mice, basically, and that caribou bones were
>: only found around human settlements. All three of these are lies.
>:
>: It may or may not be the case that human over-hunting are a threat to
>: the caribou -- but this question has been obscured for the next year
>: or so, until Mowat's dishonesty works its way through the system and
>: through the public's consciousness. In the meantime, if there is harm
>: being done to the caribou, Mowat is the person responsible for it.
>
>Perhaps, then, you can offer a principled discussion of the scientific
>literature on ozone and the effect on it of CFCs.
Talk about changing the subject Bruce, WOW! I would have to believe
that you don't like that one.
I would suggest, if you wish to start such a discussion, you should do
so. I have to warn you though, that there was recently a long
discussion of that, maybe you could get some newbies interested. It
would be nice if you started a new thread to do so though, we have
gotten far enough off of this one already.
References: