[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sustainability: Aa brief definition by John Ikerd
- To: permaculture <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Sustainability: Aa brief definition by John Ikerd
- From: "Lawrence F. London, Jr." <london@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <LYR75156-16336-1999.08.31-20.32.03--london#metalab.unc.edu@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Newsgroups: permaculture
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, lbarnes wrote:
> I have a pet peeve about sustainability definitions which mention
> "meeting the needs of the present" when we are already overconsuming the
> carrying capacity of the planet now! I suggest folks become more
> educated about each of our "ecological footprints" and the complete and
> combined effects of our exorbinate life-styles.- Reply publically or
> privately to me, Lee Barnes
You're preaching to the choir, Lee. I've read many of John's posts in
sanet-mg and am convinced that he meant "meeting the needs (what we really
need and not what we don't: basic necessities, no wasted energy
or natural resources, be self-sufficient, grow your own food) of the
present". Ken Kesey once said: "Take what you need but don't take what you
don't need".
Time to demonstrate, educate and convince others of the value of simple
living and living close to nature.