[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GBlist: plastic lumber
Further to the note below about effect of temperature on the above. We
just completed construction of a backyard deck at our demonstration
project using the above for the deck (using 2x6s), built-in benches and
planter boxes (using 4x4s). Surface temperatures were consistently hotter
(by at least 5 degrees C) than for a piece of wood, eventhough the PL was a
light grey colour. Outgassing may be a problem adjacent to open windows
during sunny days in the summer.
_________________________________________________________
Jorg Ostrowski, M. Arch. A.S. (MIT), B. Arch. (Toronto), Ecotect
- in full-time professional practice since 1976 (Straw Bale since 1978),
environmental/architectural design, ecological planning, consulting
on sustainable buildings/communities. Lectures, seminars, workshops.
3 demonstration projects in Canada, +80,000 visitors
- living a conserver lifestyle & working in a sustainable home and office
ACE, ARE, ACT, ASH-Incs., Phone: (403) 239-1882, Fax: (403) 547-2671
Web Site [under construction]: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jdo/ecotecture.htm
______________________________________________________
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997 sbtauto@juno.com wrote:
> If you know of a supplier or manufacturer who is offering plastic wood
> cheaper than real wood I would (hee, hee) like to know about them please.
>
> I would like to build a front entrance fence with this material.
> Everything I have priced so far exceeds the price of real wood.
>
> The only concern I have about this material is how well it will do when
> exposed to weather extremes. In particular, months of sunlight at
> temperatures above 90 F. We have seen plastic in automobiles break down
> and turn to dust. There are indications that ABS and high impact plastic
> will perform better but it takes time (years) to prove this.
>
> Funny thing about Mother Nature, she's slow.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 1997 08:21:02 -0600 ejh@idcomm.com (Edward J Hartnett)
> writes:
> >I agree with you concerning avoiding situations where wood comes in
> >contact
> >with the ground.
> >
> >There are some good reasons for decks though! For example, the mud
> >where
> >I'm living now (and also on the land I bought) is enough to keep you
> >inside, except we have a deck.
> >
> >I also like decks because here in Colorado (and in most other parts of
> >the
> >USA) you can use the outdoors as part of your home for much of the
> >year.
> >I'd rather have a deck with a gas grill and some chairs, then a bigger
> >house and no deck. The deck provides great space for parties and just
> >sitting around.
> >
> >What I am looking at is this plastic wood (i.e. made from
> >post-consumer
> >plastic and wood chips). It can be cut and screwed like wood, but
> >doesn't
> >need any finishing and is of course completely water-proof and termite
> >resistant. Looks pretty much just like wood from about 6 feet away.
> >Last I
> >heard it costs $1.30 a linear foot for a 2x4. This is about ten cents
> >per
> >foot cheaper than redwood and realistically it will last longer.
> >
> >Any comments? Anyone out there using this?
> >
> >I have two concerns:
> >
> >1 - What happens when it burns? Toxic fumes?
> >
> >2 - There's probably no way to ever get rid of the stuff.
> >
> >----------
> >> From: John Salmen <terrain@seaside.net>
> >> I guess my basic opinion on the whole question of wood preservatives
> >is
> >> one of avoidance in other words that the only wood that should be
> >near
> >> the ground or in a moist situation should have its roots intact. I
> >can't
> >> think of any building application that should require the use of
> >> pressure treated wood to maintain integrity - there is always a
> >design
> >> alternative and that alternative shouldn't consist of finding an
> >> environmentally appropriate way of making wood decay resistant.
> >>
> >> I'm not a fan of uncovered decks (I always thought them expressive
> >of
> >> some fear of being close to the ground) but a wooden deck properly
> >built
> >> using heartwood planks oriented properly and UNFINISHED should
> >outlast
> >> its purpose.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> TBren46501@aol.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> > In a message dated 6/9/97 3:55:34 PM, crkoehn@mailbag.com (Chris &
> >> > Ruth
> >> > Koehn) wrote:
> >> >
> >> > <<We've been considering using some of the native and naturally
> >rot
> >> > resistant wood species in place of cca treated wood. My forestry
> >> > connections suggest that walnut, certain species of locust, red
> >cedar,
> >> > and katalpa are all very rot resistent- in some circumstances as
> >much
> >> > so
> >> > as cca treated wood (my father in law used locust for fence posts
> >on
> >> > his
> >> > farm, which have been in ground contact for 50 years and still
> >look
> >> > good). In many instances logs can be had for the trouble of
> >removal
> >> > here
> >> > in Wisconsin. Most of these trees are extremely invasive, and
> >> > considered
> >> > "weeds" by farmers and woodlot owners.
> >> >
> >> > Any experiences with these materials? I know it's a hassle cutting
> >and
> >> > sawing and drying.
> >> >
> >> > How about using this ACQ preserve stuff? Anybody tried it?
> >> >
> >> > Chris Koehn
> >> > Top Ridge Homes>>
> >> >
> >> > Hi Chris,
> >> >
> >> > Yep. My experience with white locust, arborvitae, red cedar,
> >redwood
> >> > and
> >> > cypress is that they are extremely well protected from fungal
> >> > breakdown and
> >> > insect infestation. I'd like to see programs that grow,
> >transport,
> >> > machine,
> >> > transport and eventually dispose of them managed in ways that
> >minimize
> >> > impact. Here's my "yesbuts". None of these trees are weeds. I
> >don't
> >> > know if
> >> > any of them are being managed as a renewable resource. I'd like
> >to
> >> > hear from
> >> > the eco-foresters on that one. Last I knew, cypress was a species
> >at
> >> > risk
> >> > (too bad cause it lasts the best). Working these woods without
> >> > respiratory
> >> > protection will expose you to the natural toxins present in every
> >one
> >> > of
> >> > them. My old partner and I ended up at the emergency room with
> >toxic
> >> > shock
> >> > after three days of working with black walnut. Lastly, locust is
> >damn
> >> > bear
> >> > to saw, plane or sand - a tool eater. - Terry
> >> > __________________________________________________________________
> >> > This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by Oikos (www.oikos.com)
> >> > and Environmental Building News (www.ebuild.com). For instructions
> >> > send e-mail to greenbuilding-request@crest.org.
> >> > __________________________________________________________________
> >> __________________________________________________________________
> >> This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by Oikos (www.oikos.com)
> >> and Environmental Building News (www.ebuild.com). For instructions
> >> send e-mail to greenbuilding-request@crest.org.
> >> __________________________________________________________________
> >__________________________________________________________________
> >This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by Oikos (www.oikos.com)
> >and Environmental Building News (www.ebuild.com). For instructions
> >send e-mail to greenbuilding-request@crest.org.
> >__________________________________________________________________
> >
> __________________________________________________________________
> This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by Oikos (www.oikos.com)
> and Environmental Building News (www.ebuild.com). For instructions
> send e-mail to greenbuilding-request@crest.org.
> __________________________________________________________________
>
__________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by Oikos (www.oikos.com)
and Environmental Building News (www.ebuild.com). For instructions
send e-mail to greenbuilding-request@crest.org.
__________________________________________________________________
References: