[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: Good news for the Catawba River
- To: "Carolinabirds" <carolinabirds@duke.edu>, "Foothills Bird Club Listserv" <foothillsbirdclub@listbot.com>
- Subject: Fw: Good news for the Catawba River
- From: "Dwayne & Lori Martin" <dlmartin@twave.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 20:41:31 -0400
- Reply-To: "Dwayne & Lori Martin" <dlmartin@twave.net>
- Sender: carolinabirds-owner@acpub.duke.edu
This is good news for all of us who live near the Catawba!
*************************
Dwayne & Lori Martin
Foothills Bird Club
Claremont, NC
dlmartin@twave.net
>200 Miles of streams to be protected. In a gesture that
>delighted land conservation groups, Crescent Resources Inc. said
>Tuesday it will permanently protect all its land along streams
>that flow into the Catawba River and its lakes. (052400c.htm)
><http://www.charlotte.com/observer/local/pub/streams0524.htm>
>
>From "The Insider"
>CONSERVATION PLEDGE: In a move that delighted conservation groups,
>Crescent Resources Inc. said it will permanently protect all its land
>along streams that flow into the Catawba River and its lakes. The pledge
>bars development alongside nearly 200 miles of year-round streams in 14
>counties in N.C. and S.C. and includes Crescent property on the free-
>flowing stretches of the Catawba. The company also pledged $500,000 to
>help other landowners protect property along the streams. Crescent
>estimated the money could pay for expenses, such as surveys and legal
>work, to protect an additional 100 miles of streams (Bruce Henderson,
>CHARLOTTE OBSERVER, 5/24). Crescent, the land management and development
>arm of Duke Energy, is one of the largest private landowners in N.C. and
>S.C., with about 200,000 acres in the two states. While the move will
>gain tax credits for Crescent, the company said it acted to preserve the
>streams and serve as a model for other landowners. Conservationists said
>they knew of no private water protection effort of that magnitude. The
>announcement came after N.C. officials this month delayed work on
>requiring buffer zones along the Catawba River. It was uncertain whether
>that proposal would include streams feeding the river. Crescent
>officials said they considered the easements for several months, and
>weren't influenced by the state's effort.
>
>
>