70
President Roosevelt to Mrs.
William A. Becker, President General, Daughters of the American Revolution [28]
APRIL 20, 1936.
MY DEAR MRS. BECKER:
I had looked forward with pleasure to the
opportunity to appear this year before the 45th annual Continental Congress of
the Daughters of the American Revolution. You will understand, I am sure, why
that is not now possible. I shall be grateful, however, if you will extend my
cordial greetings to the officers and delegates assembled.
This Administration, as you know, stands for
adequate national defense. It stands, also, for the policy of the good
neighbor. These are not contradictory principles. As they are followed by this
Administration they represent an expression of the purpose of peace.
[28] The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin
D. Roosevelt (New York, Random House, 1938), vol. 5, p. 173.
315
DOCUMENTS
There is much confusion of thought and some
unnecessary apprehension on this matter of national defense. There are sincere
and 1 patriotic people who have been led to believe that our military and naval
establishments are inferior and inadequate. That, so stated, is a totally wrong
conclusion. It has been the aim of this Administration to make our national
defense efficient and to keep it adequate. Today our defense forces are on a
stronger peace-time basis than before. It is our purpose to keep them that way.
There are other equally sincere and patriotic
people who look upon our system of national defense as much too large for our
needs; an unnecessary expense, a threat, perhaps, to peace. That, too, is a
totally wrong conclusion. When we say adequate defense we mean just that. The
prospect of a war of aggression has no place in our American policy. It has no
place in our military or naval program. We are maintaining a system that will
meet our defensive needs. We have no plans for any other kind of system.
Americans generally will agree that some
measure of preparedness for defense is necessary. They disagree as to how much
is necessary. The policy of the Government on that point is determined by
several factors. First of all, it is determined by a very common-sense fact. If
we take on any of the obligations of self-protection, it follows that we must
take on all the obligations of self-protection. We have, for example, two
extensive and widely separated coasts to guard. There would be no sense in a
preparedness policy adequate for the defense! of only one coast. Defense must be
adequate, not sectionally adequate but nationally adequate.
Now our answer to the question as to what is
nationally adequate is not always the same. It changes—is bound to change—with
changing international situations. If this were a disarming world it is obvious
that our needs would be proportionately decreasing. I regret that today this is
not that kind of world. I regret it deeply.
But here we confront the question of
disarmament. On that issuer our policy is clear. That policy has two elements
in it. First, we propose to press, continually, for a limitation of armaments
by international agreement. Second, failing to get that, we will make no
increase of our own armaments unless other powers by increasing their armaments
make increase by us necessary to our national safety.
If progress in armament limitation has been
slow, progress in other areas has been rapid. We have stated the principle of
the good neighbor as the standard for the conduct of our foreign policy. We
have begun the practice of that principle. Already that practice has ushered!
in a new era of good-will between ourselves and the great Nations of
316
DOCUMENTS
the Americas. One after another we are liquidating the causes of friction
and misunderstanding between us. A new confidence has been established. This
summer's Pan-American Conference will meet in an atmosphere of unprecedented
friendliness. What we have achieved in that one area is a measure of what we
desire to achieve through the whole range of our international relationships.
That achievement is wholly consistent with
our program of national defense. It is an expression of the very objectives on
which our national defense is based.
We have a disinterested, consistent and
successful foreign policy. In it we give no thought to a war of aggression on
the part of the United States. We stand firmly by our solemn treaty obligations
renouncing war as an instrument of national policy.
Very sincerely yours,
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT